Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
wot do you tink of this strength pro racket
September 16, 2011
12:01 am
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Mathieu: thanks for your very well reasoned response! I realise now that I generalised some of your points (i thought you said 4 to 6, and hence chose 5 times a week as an average! My mistake!). The reason I mentioned gingerphil in particular, because you referred to him when you said “My big fear is that players buy the racket and use it in the wrong context by thinking it will improve their smashes if they use it 1hr per day etc, which already seems to be the case from what I am reading here” Thus I thought it a good idea to inform everyone that that player in particular, was already doing an excellent job to keep himself in peak physical condition.

With regard to the heavy racket and defence, I suppose from experience, I have never met anyone who has used a heavy racket like this (or squash racket or whatever) who has decided that they needed a longer swing, in the presence of a coach. However, I take your point, if guidance isn't there, then maybe they could go the wrong way with their technique. The drill you mention IS a good one, I use it myself 🙂 but I get many more benefits from it when I use a heavy racket. However, I would use it to get me “in the groove”, and then quickly switch back to my regular racket (after a couple of minutes probably). As I said, it just provides a little check point that you are doing it right.

I agree that this racket will not be anywhere near as beneficial as additional training/court time. Practice on court is invaluable, and, in theory, no amount of increased difficulty can help someone who plays three times a week beat an equivalent player training 6 times a week (which is why its so crazy that Danish players are so good compared to asian players, they have only a fraction of the court time!). However, many people will, I expect, want an edge over their regular sparring and league players, who are also playing a similar number of nights. Thus, I feel these rackets really would benefit those players, but they should rightly understand it cannot be a magic solution! There is no replacement for practice and excellent technique. However, for these players, reaching “the top” usually means winning a couple more league games and playing better in a higher division, and then progressing further – a tremendous achievement in my opinion!

Your comments have not been taken personally! It is good to have people contributing with so much detail!

I think, at the very least, using a training racket, as you mentioned, as part of a warm up (pre training session or match), would benefit many many players out there, and from what you were told, it seems the experts agree!

Cheers!

Matt

September 16, 2011
3:22 am
Avatar
Mathieu
Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
June 18, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

DLP and Matt, I think your replies are a very good conclusion to this topic!

Those rackets have great potential if used properly, but they are training tools and not “magic solutions”. It is also important to watch out and monitor  technique and injury

Also like DLP mentioned, periodization is important but I don't want to get in the little details as I am not an expert on this topic (I usually ask my strength coach/kinesiologist to help me when it comes to specific periodization patterns).

 

Mathieu

October 7, 2011
10:18 pm
Avatar
sketchy
UK
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 40
Member Since:
April 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Seems like a huge waste of money. You can get a steel racket with the same weight / length / frame shape / grip size / etc – and it'll only cost you £5.

October 8, 2011
10:34 am
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My experience is that those cheap rackets don't feel fit for playing. Frequently the poor construction results in a stainless steel racket head snapping clean off the shaft and sailing through the air onto the far wall, hopefully not damaging anything or anyone, and all within the first couple of minutes of play. These same weaknesses also mean that stringing to any reasonable tension can be a risk, especially when you see the frame bend whilst stringing them. Do you have any sturdier £5 rackets in mind?

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1531

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

t123, LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283