Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Advice on racket and string tension
July 8, 2012
3:01 pm
Avatar
xOmega
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello everyone,

 

I've been reading around quite a bit on rackets and string tensions, mostly on here and badmintoncentral, in search of finding the new racket and string (tension) combination that would best suit me. 

 

I would consider myself an intermediate player. I play 2 times a week, 6h in total. I'm more of a defensive player. I'm now looking for a new racket. My main problem is that i can't get enough length into my baseline to baseline shots. i realize it’s probably mostly technique, but i have a feeling my current string setup might be wrong as well.

 

I currently use an apacs power 900 racket with BG65 strings at 22lbs. i always play plastic shuttles. After some research, i'm considering upgrading to a voltric 70 with nanogy98 strings (because of their high repulsion). I'm not sure if anyone can tell me if this would be a good idea? Do these strings fit the racket or would any other do good/better as well (BG80?). More importantly, what tension should i string at? apparently, one should string lower when playing plastic shuttles, so should i maybe go down to 21 or 20? or should i still string at 22, taking into account that the strings will lose some tension over time? or does the nanogy98 doesn't lose much tension?

 

Any advice is very welcome, thank you!

July 8, 2012
4:29 pm
Avatar
RobHarrison
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 106
Member Since:
April 15, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi, welcome to the forum.

If you are struggling to clear back to back then I would suggest it is almost definitely your technique that is letting you down.

The problem with what you are planning on doing is that you are going to change three seperate things in your setup (racket, string and tension) so you will have no idea which factor is making the biggest difference to you. I would suggest just changing the string tension of your current racket, keeping your string type the same and see how you go from there.

Any string will fit any racket, there is no 'correct' tension or string for a given racket, you simply have to try lots of different combinations out and see what you like best. You are right to adjust your tension 1lb at a time.

One final point, you say you are a defensive player, the VT70 is a head heavy offensive racket, (In my opinion). Not sure this would be a good choice for you unless you are planning to become more attacking.

July 9, 2012
11:26 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Great points Rob!

 

Personally, i would suggest you book an appointment with a coach before you spend money on another racquet. Have you technique analysed and corrected before considering changing your racquet otherwise potentially you're wasting your money.

 

APACS 900 is a heavy heavy racquet from memory so, whilst you should be able to migrate to a Voltric, it is important you consider what you need to get from this racquet. Read my article on choosing a racquet as you may find it really useful.

 

22lbs tension on a racquet is reasonably high, especially when you playing with plastic shuttles. Have you tested the shuttles for speed? If not, watch my video and read my articles on testing a shuttle. It could be your problem is purely related to incorrect shuttle speeds as I've discovered at numerous clubs I've visited.

 

I would question increasig string tension when you are playing with plastic shuttles however, it is a test you must do. It may be that you generate a little more power with 23lbs although this generally goes against the grain for increased tension.

 

Keep us informed what happens.

 

to your success

 

Paul

July 9, 2012
1:47 pm
Avatar
Peter Warman
United Kingdom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 239
Member Since:
May 25, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I was going to reply to Rob's post by Paul has beaten me to it!

 

Anyway, I have to third Rob's points. Changing all three at the same time isn't going to help as much as you would like it to.

 

Regarding rackets, is there actually ANYTHING you don't like about your current racket, strings aside? Does it have a nice weight? A head shape that you like? Are you just wanting to buy a new racket because you are bored of your old one? If your racket is fine, then I would agree that maybe try adjusting your strings before venturing off to buy a new racket. Also, changing strings might have different tension holding properties, but they also feel different and play differently. And this is not something that you can change too and go “WOW, these strings are great”. Some times it completely messes up your shots (BG65Ti tend to be have a bit of trampoline effect, so you may have adjusted to play with this style) and it some times can take a bit of time to get used to the string to actually get to the point where you can say, these strings are for me or they aren't.

 

Finding the right string, tension or racket isn't a quick thing, it generally takes time (and money).

 

Paul, being a coach, is right that it is probably worth getting some coaching, however, depending on the level/commitment you have for badminton, this may not be an option for you. You could try watching some coaching videos on YouTube and maybe try a different tension (or string).

 

Hope the comments help. Cool

Badminton Gives Me A Purpose In Life – To Serve Others
I'd Rather Be Playing Badminton…………..

July 9, 2012
8:30 pm
Avatar
Ed
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 186
Member Since:
March 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Just my 2 cents of advice: there are a few very good advisors on this forum (nope, I'm not one of them), and even a coach. If you watch coaching videos on the tube, I've seen very good ones and I've seen complete crap. Might be worth asking these people's advice before kicking off.

All the best ! ED

July 10, 2012
5:51 pm
Avatar
Peter Warman
United Kingdom
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 239
Member Since:
May 25, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That is actually a very good point, I’ve not watched any YouTube videos but yes, good point. If you didn’t know what you are looking for, telling the difference between the good and bad videos would be hard so you could learn the wrong things and techniques.

Badminton Gives Me A Purpose In Life – To Serve Others
I'd Rather Be Playing Badminton…………..

July 12, 2012
4:01 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yes, there are many very poor videos on Youtube and the danger is you copy the wrong one.

 

Whenever there is a potential for technique faults, a video isn't going to help unless the player can see themselves in action and they know exactly what to look for.

 

A trained eye can spot the flaws and help correct them a lot faster. Considering none of us appear to have much time these days, would you spend the time trying to analyse what you are doing wrong against a video or go to a coach and get it sorted – quick?

 

I do think videos have a good place in the education of a player, especially if they are done well. And that includes my videos!

 

Paul

July 25, 2012
4:43 pm
Avatar
xOmega
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hi again,

 

first of all, apologies for the belated reply. i was away for a while.

 

A few days after that post, i had the extreme luck and coincidence of having a player from another club coming over to our club…who was playing a voltric 70. So i “stole” his racket for a while and was able to play around with it a bit 🙂

 

it feels somewhat lighter and more head-heavy than my current one. I especially like the grip more, though that's somewhat more of a detail i guess. 

 

I just received mine today and i'll play it tomorrow. i wi'll let you know how it went 🙂 I also thank you for the youtube video advice. i'll see if i can spot some proper ones, but suggestions are always welcomed, of course. i'll obviously start with those on here 🙂

July 27, 2012
3:53 pm
Avatar
gingerphil79
Northern Ireland, UK
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 158
Member Since:
August 10, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To be honest with you, the racket etc is not really the problem here, it might slightly improve you game but its your technique which is the problem. Fix this and your power will come. Although Paul says 22lbs is high, its basically your standard factory poundage so you should be able to hit the back line.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
127 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1529

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn, Suzena, Manoj

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283