Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
nanoray z-speed. new world record
September 19, 2013
11:53 pm
Avatar
zack
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 49
Member Since:
December 28, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Tan boon heong the malaysia legend had broken his old record of 421km/h and raised it to 493km/h. Lee chong wei got upto 456 km/h. cant belive yonex did this, definately trying out this awesome racket.

September 20, 2013
12:03 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Zack

 

As the saying goes..”there are measurements…and there are measurements.” The previous world record was measured in a competitive situation. Now it seems that laboratory testing is allowed. Oh well.

 

Funny how Tan Boon Heong has been unable to generate the same power in competitive matches. I watched him play at the World Championships. According to Yonex he should have been hitting consistently high powered smashes beyond 300 km/h. If so, why is his opponents retrieved so many smashes in the game and won? If he hit anywhere near 456 km/h then he would have won the tournament.

 

A racket will not act like a magic wand and suddenly create all of this power in a player. Powerful smashes are as a direct result of a number of important attributes…

 

1) correct technique

2) fitness of the player

3) genetics of the player

 

Notice I don't include the racket or strings in my top 3, simply because if a player has the above then they can literally hit with anything although I would suggest a stiffer racket is less likely to break.

 

Paul

September 20, 2013
2:00 pm
Avatar
yuki onitsura
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
July 13, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree that it's completely useless to be able to rain down 493 km/h smashes in lab conditions but it's still a pretty impressive feat, if only for the sake of the record. Played with a Z-Speed last weekend and while I sure as hell doubt my smashes were getting anywhere close to 200, let alone 493, it is still a very good zippy racquet. Interesting that Yonex decided to pop it under the Nanoray range though because it feels more balanced than head light to me.

September 22, 2013
10:22 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm getting a lot of mixed messages about Z Speed and from all I've read this is not a head light racket. in fact it reads as though it's bordering on head heavy. Whoever heard of a head heavy Nanoray?

 

So, on the one hand Yonex have yet again got the market frenzy going however this time the specs seem to have caused so much confusion, there is a huge amount of resistance to this racket. Shame.

 

Paul

September 22, 2013
10:27 pm
Avatar
lee cartlidge
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Commanding a top price too.

have i read right that it is a head light racket?

Always thought a head heavy raquet would hold the record or does this raquet just break the mold?

 

lee

September 22, 2013
10:30 pm
Avatar
lee cartlidge
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

just read your post paul after posting mine  Yell

 

just been on central sports and it advertises it as a head light

September 23, 2013
7:59 pm
Avatar
RobHarrison
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 106
Member Since:
April 15, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Direct Sports 'independant' specs list it as head heavy.

I see £190, I see a clashed racket, I see me quietly sobbing in the corner of a badminton hall. I could get 3 VT7's for that!!

September 24, 2013
7:11 am
Avatar
lee cartlidge
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

central sports specs

ULTRA HI-MODULUS GRAPHITEH.M. Graphite, SONIC METAL, EX-HMG
FLEXStiff
HEAD SHAPEIsometric
BALANCEHead light
MFRS. MAX STRINGING TENSION27 lbs
COUNTRY OF ORIGINJapan
LAUNCH DATESeptember 2013
WEIGHT VARIATIONYonex Official Spec 3U (85-89.9g) G4

direct sports specs

We weight it at: 93 g
Balance (Direct Sports measurement): 311 mm from handle – Head heavy
 
Flex (Direct Sports measurement): 61 mm – Flexible
 
Construction: HM Graphite/X-Fullerene/Sonic Metal
Why is it that the specs are so different?
Is it because one of them is official info from yonex and the other is from the retailer giving there opinion, if so which one would u believe to be right?
looking to buy a raquet that has a even balance but its geting confusing when u see two diffferent specs.
P.s not looking at getting this raquet price range well out of my league, looks a nice raquet though
thanks
lee
 
 
September 24, 2013
9:23 am
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The specification from central sports is the “official” specification. I am not sure how direct sports do it – whether the 93g is strung/unstrung etc, what they class as a flexible racket etc. If I were choosing a racket, and I know I like head heavy and stiff rackets, then I would only start with those that the retailer has classed as head heavy and stiff, given it is hopefully similar in specification to the other rackets they have with the same classification (which I liked). I would also try those that were just head heavy, and those that were just stiff. The point is I probably would not venture towards a head light flexible racket.

The important thing, the ONLY important thing, is that once I pick it up and have a hit with it, I either like it or I don't. There are some head heavy stiff rackets that I prefer compared with other head heavy stiff rackets.

The other thing to bear in mind is that adding grips completely changes the weight of the racket.

I would gladly give this one a try, but I doubt it will compare to my ZForce.

September 25, 2013
7:14 am
Avatar
lee cartlidge
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks for that Matthew

 

When looking at buying another raquet i will look at specs off brands own website.

 

Was given a voltric 80 for christmas last year and it just doesnt feel comfortable to play with, i'm back using my trusted carlton fireblade tour.

 

just been browsing for a backup/replacement raquet with the same specs, though there doesnt seem to b many even balance raquets out there which r in stock for sale, but like u say i wont know if its the right raquet for me until i play with it on court 

 

Lee

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
191 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1529

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn, Suzena, Manoj

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283