Discussion Forum
Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !
Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.
Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE
To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right. Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.
12:03 pm
February 15, 2011
Zack
As the saying goes..”there are measurements…and there are measurements.” The previous world record was measured in a competitive situation. Now it seems that laboratory testing is allowed. Oh well.
Funny how Tan Boon Heong has been unable to generate the same power in competitive matches. I watched him play at the World Championships. According to Yonex he should have been hitting consistently high powered smashes beyond 300 km/h. If so, why is his opponents retrieved so many smashes in the game and won? If he hit anywhere near 456 km/h then he would have won the tournament.
A racket will not act like a magic wand and suddenly create all of this power in a player. Powerful smashes are as a direct result of a number of important attributes…
1) correct technique
2) fitness of the player
3) genetics of the player
Notice I don't include the racket or strings in my top 3, simply because if a player has the above then they can literally hit with anything although I would suggest a stiffer racket is less likely to break.
Paul
2:00 pm
July 13, 2013
I agree that it's completely useless to be able to rain down 493 km/h smashes in lab conditions but it's still a pretty impressive feat, if only for the sake of the record. Played with a Z-Speed last weekend and while I sure as hell doubt my smashes were getting anywhere close to 200, let alone 493, it is still a very good zippy racquet. Interesting that Yonex decided to pop it under the Nanoray range though because it feels more balanced than head light to me.
10:22 pm
February 15, 2011
I'm getting a lot of mixed messages about Z Speed and from all I've read this is not a head light racket. in fact it reads as though it's bordering on head heavy. Whoever heard of a head heavy Nanoray?
So, on the one hand Yonex have yet again got the market frenzy going however this time the specs seem to have caused so much confusion, there is a huge amount of resistance to this racket. Shame.
Paul
10:27 pm
October 28, 2012
10:30 pm
October 28, 2012
7:59 pm
April 15, 2010
7:11 am
October 28, 2012
central sports specs
ULTRA HI-MODULUS GRAPHITE | H.M. Graphite, SONIC METAL, EX-HMG |
---|---|
FLEX | Stiff |
HEAD SHAPE | Isometric |
BALANCE | Head light |
MFRS. MAX STRINGING TENSION | 27 lbs |
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN | Japan |
LAUNCH DATE | September 2013 |
WEIGHT VARIATION | Yonex Official Spec 3U (85-89.9g) G4 |
direct sports specs
9:23 am
VIP Coaching Program Members
August 12, 2010
The specification from central sports is the “official” specification. I am not sure how direct sports do it – whether the 93g is strung/unstrung etc, what they class as a flexible racket etc. If I were choosing a racket, and I know I like head heavy and stiff rackets, then I would only start with those that the retailer has classed as head heavy and stiff, given it is hopefully similar in specification to the other rackets they have with the same classification (which I liked). I would also try those that were just head heavy, and those that were just stiff. The point is I probably would not venture towards a head light flexible racket.
The important thing, the ONLY important thing, is that once I pick it up and have a hit with it, I either like it or I don't. There are some head heavy stiff rackets that I prefer compared with other head heavy stiff rackets.
The other thing to bear in mind is that adding grips completely changes the weight of the racket.
I would gladly give this one a try, but I doubt it will compare to my ZForce.
7:14 am
October 28, 2012
Thanks for that Matthew
When looking at buying another raquet i will look at specs off brands own website.
Was given a voltric 80 for christmas last year and it just doesnt feel comfortable to play with, i'm back using my trusted carlton fireblade tour.
just been browsing for a backup/replacement raquet with the same specs, though there doesnt seem to b many even balance raquets out there which r in stock for sale, but like u say i wont know if its the right raquet for me until i play with it on court
Lee
Most Users Ever Online: 676
Currently Online:
191 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Matthew Seeley: 391
Peter Warman: 239
Ed: 186
Dobbie98: 165
gingerphil79: 158
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 10
Members: 1529
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 8
Topics: 581
Posts: 4716
Newest Members:
ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn, Suzena, ManojModerators: Design: 0
Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283