Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Power Versus Repulsion In Racket And String
February 27, 2014
9:17 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Luke

 

Repulsion is how the shuttle springs off the strings and racket head. Think of a plastic spoon. If you bend it slightly you could fling an object with considerable force. That is repulsion. There is no power or force being applied in a forward direction. In this case the force is applied in an opposite direction to create the repulsion.

 

With a racket you have the forward momentum – power which flexes the shaft and head. As the shuttle reaches the string it is absorbed into the stringbed and then repelled. This happens at around the same time the racket head and shaft regain their original shape – hence repulsion from the string and racket.

 

Paul

March 2, 2014
4:08 pm
Avatar
Luke85
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
August 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you very much for the reply.

So “power” and “repulsion” are different afterall, but interrelated through speed. CMIIW.

I must admit I’ll need sometime to fully digest everything in this thread combined. Meanwhile, time for me to test more rackets and strings in the quest of finding MY combo.
I hope I’m better prepared to distinguish between them from now on.

Thank you again.

P.S what is “repulsion power”?

March 3, 2014
9:16 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Luke

 

I would consider repulsion power to be the measure of speed that is created by repulsion. I've not heard this phrase before and just proves the level of confusion in badminton.

 

Paul

March 7, 2014
4:51 pm
Avatar
Luke85
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
August 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Paul, I found this phrase in a copy of 2011 Yonex Catalogue, string part.
In their rating system, Yonex’s “R” stands for “repulsion power”.

My personal suspicion on what it actually is is similar to yours, but perhaps you would look further into this?

In any case I recall using 10-R-rated strings, BG66UM and NBG98. Found both to be capable of bouncing the bird away real fast. Was happy playing lotsa attacking clears, drives and defensive lifts.

March 9, 2014
9:02 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Luke

 

Also remember that phrases are created for marketing purposes. Next we'll be getting rating on repulsion power and then we will all be confused!

 

Paul

March 16, 2014
9:13 am
Avatar
Luke85
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
August 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You are right, Paul. Let’s leave it there.

Btw, since my string had snapped, I asked my stringer to put a little bit of lead on top of the frame (good old Carbonex 8SP) and strung it with NBG99. Now the feel of my racket is completely different. More power yes! But I have to be more careful not to injure myself…

Just saying… 🙂

March 16, 2014
9:33 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Luke

 

That depends on how much lead tape was used. That's why I use Victor's Powerizer because it fits so well onto a frame and adds small amount of weight at any time.

 

There's a lot of players who would benefit by testing the weight of their racket first before continually looking for a new racket. The cost of Powerizer is around £5 so itt's certainly worth a test.

 

Paul

March 24, 2014
2:22 pm
Avatar
Luke85
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
August 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you Paul for the tip.
Well my racket is relatively heavy in its own right being an old model from the 80’s. Adding weight on top exacerbates it but I think I am improving. For one thing this heavyweight is suitable for your armchair exercises.

I still wish to one day own a proper 3U racket though, perhaps a VT5 first.

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
102 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1532

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

vishu08, t123, LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283