Discussion Forum
Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !
Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.
Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE
To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right. Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.
8:48 pm
February 15, 2011
Matt is correct about repulsion. Think of it in terms of tension in a racquet. High repulsion can only occur when the shuttle contact with the string is low i.e. as soon as it touches the string, the string does its job. Low repulsion means the shuttle sinks into the string and more of its energy is absorbed. The strings, being a lesser tension, stretch more before catapulting the shuttle with the force of the hit.
If you’re not sure what tension to have in your racquet, then you’re in the same position as countless other players. This again is a very personal choice. It’s gets a little easier in time as your experience soon plays a part and tells you whether you prefer the string tighter or slacker. This means that even if you change racquets, you get quickly find your new preferred tension and continue enjoying this great game.
I’d say a high percentage of players haven’t got a clue about string or tension and probably don’t even care.
Paul
Most Users Ever Online: 676
Currently Online:
46 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Matthew Seeley: 391
Peter Warman: 239
Ed: 186
Dobbie98: 165
gingerphil79: 158
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 10
Members: 1532
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 8
Topics: 581
Posts: 4716
Newest Members:
vishu08, t123, LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1Moderators: Design: 0
Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283