My guess is there's a reason why the specs on Victor rackets are similar. However, have you ever tested the range when they are placed next to each other giving you the opportunity to feel the difference. It's quite an experience.

Whenever you look at the specifications, some players wonder why there isn't a racket at either end. I consider this is because the number of players requiring these specs is simply too small to consider making the racket.

I also believe that there is little need for light headed rackets when most players don't suit them and, in reality they aren't that light headed when you measure them. Case in point, Yonex Nanoray rackets are not as light headed as the Nanospeed range.

What the manufacturers are doing is offering more 4U or lighter versions which negates the need for head light frames. If this trend continues I wonder whether there will be a head light range of rackets at all.

In essence what you have with the Victor range is not quite as tight as specs lead you to believe. The only way you know this is to test.

In closing and having run so many demo sessions for players and clubs, I believe the majority of club players settle on medium flex, even balance to slightly head heavy rackets. This may be localised, but that's what I've found.

Paul