Discussion Forum
Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !
Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.
Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE
To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right. Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.
10:21 am
March 10, 2013
I wrote in a previous post.
Has anyone any comments on the backhand flick serve, particularly the best way of disguise, and do all backhand low serve styles lend themselves to good flick serves
Paul replied
Great question on backhand flick serves.
I visited a club recently for a coaching day. I always say “if I had to choose between a partner with a big smash and one that can serve well, I'd choose the server all the time.”
Whilst coaching we did some work on the serve. One player has a nice low serve but cannot flick. Her style is to point her racket almost vertically. Would she change? No. Was she accurate enough with her low serve? No. This is when I question why I should bother. She wants results but isn't prepared to change what isn't working well enough. This style of serve does not allow the racket face to meet the shuttle correctly to create a force and therefore will not allow enough movement for a flick.
The other issues I find with technique that prevent a decent flick serve is by serving too close to the body. There is no room for the racket or hands to create the squeeze for the flick.
I'll contribute again later but open this up for others to comment.
I hope in this new post we'll get some replies on this fundamental aspect of our game
Rogerh said:
I wrote in a previous post.
Has anyone any comments on the backhand flick serve, particularly the best way of disguise, and do all backhand low serve styles lend themselves to good flick serves
Paul replied
Great question on backhand flick serves.
I visited a club recently for a coaching day. I always say “if I had to choose between a partner with a big smash and one that can serve well, I’d choose the server all the time.”
Whilst coaching we did some work on the serve. One player has a nice low serve but cannot flick. Her style is to point her racket almost vertically. Would she change? No. Was she accurate enough with her low serve? No. This is when I question why I should bother. She wants results but isn’t prepared to change what isn’t working well enough. This style of serve does not allow the racket face to meet the shuttle correctly to create a force and therefore will not allow enough movement for a flick.
The other issues I find with technique that prevent a decent flick serve is by serving too close to the body. There is no room for the racket or hands to create the squeeze for the flick.
I’ll contribute again later but open this up for others to comment.
I hope in this new post we’ll get some replies on this fundamental aspect of our game
What I find a lot of club players do is alter the way they 'swing' when they are trying to flick as opposed to the technique on their low serve.
What this usually involves is a larger and quicker back swing, whihc I find extremely helpful for letting me know what is going to happen before the shuttle is struck.
THE ACTION SHOULD BE THE SAME AS THE SHORT SERVE. The only difference should be a squeeze on the grip upon impact with the shuttle to propel it to the back of the court. The backlift should be slow and short, exactly as it would be for a good low serve.
I also find that many players change their preparation when they are going to flick. Many players have a certain speed at which they operate at when serve, from when they get the shuttle in their hand to when they play the shot. Any noticable changes in this is a giveaway for me and as a receiver I will shift my body weight slightly back just incase.
Another common error is players turning round to playing partner just before service to tell them its going to be a flick. Not only can I often hear the word 'flick' but, many times, the only time players talk to their partner before serve is when they are going to flick! I'm not saying don't talk to your partner, the opposite infact! Dont let the 'I'm going to flick it' be the only communication!
8:15 pm
February 15, 2011
Stuart has covered so many simple and effective points here.
It amazes me at the complete lack of communication between pairs in a match. A simple discussion before any serve makes life easy and yet it rarely happens. The idea with a flick serve is to catch your opponent by surprise, not your partner. And, unless it's a good serve you really are putting huge amount of pressure on you as a pair to retrieve the return.
Stuart is also correct that many players have two completely different set ups which means it becomes easier to anticipate which serve is coming.
The flick serve should be a squeeze and a forward punch movement over possibly a 4-10 inch line towards the target. A good flick will give you some competitive advantage if you combine the element of surprise with quality placement.
The other issue I see in clubs is the rising hands and with it the rising strike point to make the serve illegal. Players must ensure the flick is sent from the same place as a low serve but this is rarely the case. I would love to see a few service judges in matches so that these issues are raised and corrected. Sadly I suspect old habits dying hard here.
Paul
Most Users Ever Online: 676
Currently Online:
119 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Matthew Seeley: 391
Peter Warman: 239
Ed: 186
Dobbie98: 165
gingerphil79: 158
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 10
Members: 1532
Moderators: 1
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 8
Topics: 581
Posts: 4716
Newest Members:
vishu08, t123, LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1Moderators: Design: 0
Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283