Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Why did the preferred low backhand serve style change?
August 4, 2011
12:19 am
Avatar
Terence
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
July 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I was watching some coaching videos online and saw one where, when serving, the shuttle was held so that it was parallel to the racket face (looks like you are striking the side of the shuttle). The more recent videos (and the way I see people serving) people hold the shuttle so that the bottom of the cork is perpendicular (more or less) to the racket face. I was told that the the “parallel” position was the old way people used to serve.

I was wondering why the serving style has changed. Are there any advantages to the “old” style?

August 4, 2011
1:03 pm
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Could you possibly show the videos?

As I understand it, you are saying the shuttle is pointing downwards (old way) versus the new way where the shuttle is pointing towards the racket strings (pointing towards the server). Am I correct?

If so, this may be due to the change in service laws, depending on just how “old” we are talking. A valid service required the shuttle was struck lower down (say 10 years ago) than it is now – the definition of valid service, waist, and other things have changed. Thus, it is now possible to hit a serve that is a little flatter in trajectory (starts higher and moves flat) as opposed to the “older” serves (still used by some) where the shuttle has to pass in a much loopier fashion first going Up over the net and then down (rather than a little bit up and down – the flatter serve).

It is my experience that holding the shuttle pointing downwards, encourages the shuttle to go higher after striking, whilst pointing towards the strings goes a little flatter. Why? I believe its because the shuttle will “reverse” its direction after contact. One that was pointing down will point much more upwards once struck, whilst one that was pointing towards the strings will flip around to point towards the net, thus the trajectories are slightly different (due to the heavy nature of the cork). Thus, with a lower contact (in the older serving rules), pointing the shuttle downwards to begin with should help it travel up over the net, whilst a higher contact point (new rules), with a flatter trajectory serve, holding it facing the strings tends to help.

Hope that made sense. Thats how I understsand it.

August 4, 2011
4:02 pm
Avatar
Terence
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
July 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Matthew – thanks. Here's a link:

 

They show it at various points, but around 2:58 is a decent starting point.

August 4, 2011
5:52 pm
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Oooooh! Crazy slice serve. My post does not relate well to this type of serve, so its not worth considering.

I personally don't think this serve is accurate enough, and would never recommend it. However, the coach is extremely experienced and an awesome player, so what do I know? 🙂 But I will stick with my non sliced serve thanks!

August 5, 2011
8:17 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Interesting debate here.
 
Personally I feel that any kind of slice on the serve is creating an unstable element. The slighest change in angle can result in a poor serve.
 
Every player I’ve partnered who has used a variation on this serve was an inconsistent server. Generally we won very few points from this serve.
 
There have been changes over the years regarding holding the shuttle. These changes have been partly caused by changes in the service rules. From memory, these videos are quite old and were shot before the latest serving rules came into force. You can generally tell this by the angle of the racquet head. It’s clear these serves were being played with the old rules in mind.
 
There are few rules about holding the shuttle. The most important is that the shuttle must be struck on the base. How you hold the shuttle to achieve that is up to you but it is far easier and more consistent to ensure you hold the shuttle by the tip of the feather, poiting the shuttle slightly forwards to expose most of the base to the stringbed. A gentle push forward is all is takes to send the shuttle over the net and into court. It’s very consistent and I haven’t had any players find that their “slice” serve is better.
 
Paul

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
113 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1529

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn, Suzena, Manoj

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283