Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
National Badminton League & New Scoring System
August 16, 2014
7:36 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Interesting comments…

It’s difficult to compare tennis and badminton. If you look at this years Wimbledon, the men’s game has changed a lot and there are more baseline rallies. This makes the game relatively easy on the eye of the TV viewer being able to watch two players slug it out. With games over relatively quickly, it also suits the attention deficit to a degree. Badminton is simply too fast compared to this. Bear in mind TV for many is entertainment and therefore viewers to not want to focus hard to watch. And that’s why badminton to the general public will never work.

Our scoring system isn’t difficult and I really can’t say how the players feel about potential changes. Everybody wants the sport to be more commercial and that’s why BWF are testing the scoring format. Sky Sports obviously don’t like this format and therefore the final game near sudden death shootout has been designed. Nobody can really say at the moment whether this system will work. I won’t know as I don’t have Sky, so won’t be watching the NBL. The players don’t excite me enough to go out of my way to watch.

I’m interested to see what happens with the other tested scoring system. I do not expect any changes to our game this year and it’s going to be interesting what results come out of the tests, if and when published. Will it impact on league badminton? Not for the immediate future because it may take an other year for Badminton England to adopt the change. After that it may take several years for leagues to adopt the new scoring system, if at all.

This is very much a sit back and let’s see what happens situation.

In the meantime, the World Championships are about to begin and I’m really looking forward to seeing quality badminton after the Commonwealth Games. I’m also ready for more commentary by Gill Clark and Morten Frost. They work well together.

Paul

August 17, 2014
8:32 am
Avatar
Dobbie98
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 165
Member Since:
December 4, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Should the new scoring system be adopted by our leagues, would this change your style of play? What changes to your game would you make? Ie would you play tactically or go all out & be aggressive?
Re commentary of Gill Clark & Morten Frost they have a good chemistry between them. I would love to sit & chat with them over a meal + would be great to commentate with them & discuss things from a clubs players view & discuss the tactics, just to see & test your own understanding of the game.

August 17, 2014
9:52 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This is a really good question and tough to answer.

A shorter game certainly favours the aggressive player. What will be essential is a good warm up and knock up to be ready to attack from the start. I think this will also encourage players to work harder on their defence, especially drive and block. It will be important to turn defence into attack as quickly as possible.

Will this change the game in league badminton? I’m not so sure. It may change results though as some players will not learn and therefore pay the price. The defender style player will struggle to win. Also those players with a weak attack will find it difficult.

Dominating the net and shutting out your opponents will become even more important and also the serve will remain the most important shot of the game. A good low serve is essential now and this won’t change. Return of serve professionally won’t change but for clubs, lifting to the rear court may be frowned upon.

With all of that said, I still believe there is a place for court craft and the ability to out think and out manoeuvre an opponent. In some respects this often overlooked skill may become important again.

I am the last person to hold onto the old scoring system if a new system is deemed to work better. However, how this will fit into a league structure is a different question and at the moment it’s anyone’s guess what impact it will have.

It’s good to debate these matters but we may be jumping the gun. Until we or our respective league clubs are asked to vote on the subject, it’s pure speculation whether it will happen.

Paul

August 24, 2014
12:42 pm
Avatar
Dobbie98
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 165
Member Since:
December 4, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Re Tv coverage as Cybershuttle mentioned the angles of cameras, think this is a good point, but think it would only work for finals when down to one court, I personally would like to see more action in slow motion showing & highlighting the skills of the players, how the shuttle is spinning. But I guess it’s all down to money.
I would like to see a ribbon being worn by players highlighting where their lowest rib is, players stats i.e left or right handed, the racket they use, etc.

August 28, 2014
3:14 pm
Avatar
Jim Moriarty
London
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
August 28, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Personally i’m very excited by the prospect of the new scoring system.

Getting to crucial points sooner is only going to enhance suitability for TV coverage in my opinion, which we must all agree is what the sport needs in this day and age. Things will always inevitably change, and the sport must evolve with the times or be lost.

The only possible negative I can think of is the effect of matches at club nights/local league etc – but i’m sure people said that and had the same worries when we moved from the old scoring system (15) to the current. That change seemed strange at first but over time things just become the accepted norm…

August 28, 2014
6:15 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’ve been following Alistair Casey who plays professionally. It’s very interesting to read his views as he’s currently played in a tournament and was quite negative about the system. I’m open-minded. There’s a great deal of testing to be done and opinions to take into consideration after the testing. Thereafter, once a decision is made it is up to the various country Associations to take this forward to their leagues. It took long enough to change to rally point system in some areas. We simply don’t know enough yet to worry about it.

Paul

August 29, 2014
9:28 am
Avatar
Jim Moriarty
London
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
August 28, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As a contrary to your point Paul, Scott Evans has been very complimentary about the tournaments he has played in at the new scoring system.

Perhaps it simply suits his game more than Alastair’s…

Horses for courses, and all that.

August 29, 2014
2:51 pm
Avatar
Cybershuttle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 34
Member Since:
May 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I never thought I would say this but… Having now played a few 5 x 11 Matches in training I am becomming a bit of a convert. What it seems to do is add a lot of intensity to the games. You cannot afford mistakes at all, a couple of times i have messed up a few points in a row, thinking in terms of the extra padding that 21 points can give then suddenly thought ‘Get it together this is only up to 11…’ It doesn’t necessarily favour attackers but definatly favours consistancy. The 11 point setup leads to natural breaks in the pro’s games as they have a break at 11 points anyway. So from a viewing point the break at 11 has more meaning and fits with the current setup. Tight games will be long and hard as ever but the one sided games that arent so interesting will be over quickly which can only be a good thing. Have to see how things pan out but it is possible the powers that be may be on to something here. :) The only thing I would add is on the final game (number 5) have the two clear points setting to win the game. After all it adds a heck of a lot of tension and you need a little uncertainty in the schedule and result.

My only real question is how it will filter down to club level. I am not sure I would want to play 1 x 11. 3 x 11 woud be acceptable though. Mind you I suppose the 1 x 11 would offer fast court turn arounds and it is likely we would be back playing sooner than if we were waiting for a game of 21’s to finish so maybe not so bad.

I would suggest you set up a few 5 x 11’s and try it out. I would be interested to see what you all think.

August 29, 2014
4:53 pm
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Cybershuttle said
My only real question is how it will filter down to club level. I am not sure I would want to play 1 x 11. 3 x 11 woud be acceptable though. Mind you I suppose the 1 x 11 would offer fast court turn arounds and it is likely we would be back playing sooner than if we were waiting for a game of 21’s to finish so maybe not so bad.

I would suggest that on a club night 2 x 11 is appropriate – its a similar number of points as there is currently, and may result in a win, lose or draw (no big deal).

Its interesting to hear you have enjoyed the new system. My main concern is it may potentially remove a fitness element to the game, which should not be lost any more… and it could detract from a tactical point of view because you have less time to work out your opponents.

August 30, 2014
12:12 pm
Avatar
Cybershuttle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 34
Member Since:
May 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As far as the tactical element is concerned because you are playing over 5 games as opposed to three I believe there will be ample opportunity to develop strategies and tactics. It may mean that you will have to alter your tactics quicker but there is definatly room for that aspect of the game. The 2 x 11 format for clubs actually sounds a pretty good idea like you say its essentially the same number of points as a current game so that could work well. I should think the 11 scoring will offer differing club formats depending on the number of players, available courts, player preferences etc…

One good aspect of using the 5 x 11 right now in training is that it seems to create more urgency and focus in each of the 11 point sets. Which means when you go back to 21’s you focus more on each half of the game. ie: more focused 0-11 and 12-21 like treating each half as two games.

I was pleasantly surprised by it.

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
14 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1530

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1, merlyn, Suzena

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283