Discussion Forum

Hopefully everything will work smoothly for you – however, if there is something wrong, please take a moment to email us (forum@badminton-coach.co.uk) so that we can put it right !

 Please do not SPAM this forum – anyone found posting non-badminton related messages or ADVERTISING without permission will be removed without notice and may be banned from using the forum in the future.

Membership of this Badminton Discussion Forum is FREE

To join, just click the Register button just BELOW on the right.  Please note however that any strange email addresses (lots of random letters etc) with an obscure user name will be deleted.

Join My Email Community

Get My Badminton Help, Advice, Hints & Tips

Direct To Your Email Inbox

Join My Email Community

Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Who is in your army?
May 11, 2011
11:01 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ray

I managed to watch the match last night. It was close. It was also one of the best singles finals I have ever seen in terms of the quality of rally. It wasn’t a nailbiter of a match, but netherless superb quality.

You asked the question what would I have told Lin Dan at the break in the second game? Well, here goes…

Personally I feel Lin Dan was a yard short in his movement compared to previous years, however he still demonstrated at times that he has the speed. I think he was too content to play at a slower pace and I would have asked him to pressure LCW by increasing the pace.

Second, Lin Dan seemed to play far too many shuttles onto LCW’s forehand side and yet still didn’t move his base forward to pressure the net. This opened LCW’s cross court slice which caught Lin Dan too many times.

I also felt that he didn’t attack very much in the game. If you look at the final from 2009 see how much more Lin Dan smashed compared to this final.

These are the things I’d initially ask him to change. He had the mental edge and I think he gave it to LCW by not pressuring especially on the big points.

That said, it could also be that Lin Dan had an off day. Another 5 % and the result could have been different.

Paul

May 13, 2011
2:44 am
Avatar
Ray
Indonesia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
April 14, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks very much for your insights, Paul! That was a great analysis. It didn't occur to me that Lin Dan was playing a lot of shuttles to LCW's forehand, but after watching the game again last night you're absolutely spot on. Much to LD's detriment, it seems. I think LCW got him where he wanted him to be, i.e. play a slow pace game, wear down his patience, apply pressure to his backhand, create forced and unforced errors on Lin Dan's part. Could it be age creeping up on LD? Hard to say, he's actually a year younger than LCW. But overall as you said, his game has slowed down a tad compared to previous years.  

May 13, 2011
6:17 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks Ray

I get the feeling that the fire has gone from Lin Dan these days and therefore he’s not always “up” for the occasion. I watched his match against Zwiebler at All Englands and couldn’t belive he dropped a game. He didn’t seem to have his usual clinical finish which gave me cause for concern. It could have been a way of saving himself for the final, but he won in 3 games rather than 2 so to me he spent more time and energy on court.

When the top 4 players in the world retire after Olympics it’s going to be interesting to see which players rise to fill this huge void. Don’t expect to see any British players – we simply aren’t good enough!

Paul

May 13, 2011
9:19 pm
Avatar
Ed
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 186
Member Since:
March 2, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Correct about the MS, if the opposition is manageable, LCW takes risks. But he won't step down yet. TH is all about risk (and that's why his games are fun watching), Gade has the most perfect drop shot of all. Tago has flashes of brilliance. A few Indian players lately prooved to be rather impressive.

But what about British MD ? I saw Marcus Ellis and Peter Mills in the final of the Belgian Open in 2009, and  they were very impressive. They lost to Ruud Bosh/Koen Ridder (yep, the SF's who lost in 3 sets from KKK/BTH in the Malaysia GP). Not so bad I would think? But I'm not a coach, what do you think Paul ? Really nobody in the British camp ? With the WC in august and the comming olympics, that's a pitty…

Cheers, ED

May 13, 2011
9:43 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ed

I think Gabby White and Jenny Wallwork have a chance of making it but they need to be fitter, stronger, more consistent.

Robertson needs to be sacked. Clarke is perhaps our best male but he needs to work on his fitness and lose some weight. Sadly, I don’t think he will.

There’s one or two younger players who may improve but I don’t see them challenging the best on a regular basis.

Ouseph has improved a lot and I hope he will break into top 10. But, he still looks unfit at times and too slow. He also needs to sharpen his overall game, but I like him and hope he goes further.

Paul

May 13, 2011
11:08 pm
Avatar
Matthew Seeley
Member
Members

VIP Coaching Program Members
Forum Posts: 391
Member Since:
August 12, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Slightly off topic (as he is now officially representing sctoland again) but I have been very impressed with Robert Blair recently. He seems to be playing some very good mixed doubles (won a tournament – German Open? – recently, and QF of All England losing in 3 games vs runners up).

 

I too would like to see Ouseph playing a higher pace of badminton – his style looks too defensive to work at the top levels, as he doesn't have the killer attack the top players have. From what I have read, he has worked hard recently, and thus I hope he achieves more success.

May 14, 2011
10:56 am
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Matthew

I agree with you about Blair. I think he’s had a bad deal from BE because he’s not liked by Robertson. Sadly, it would seem that Robertson is calling the shots at BE. To me this signals he really needs to be sacked.

Agree with you about Ouseph too.

Paul

May 15, 2011
9:29 am
Avatar
Voltric8014May
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
May 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Paul said:

Ray

Experience does play a part in a game. However, against the relatively poor opposition the lads faced, they should still have closed out every game in single figures.

I think the reason it didn't happen is threefold.

1) they didn't decide on and implement a good game plan

2) nobody decided to own the net and therefore apply pressure from here.

3) inconsistency in the third shot

 

Serve and return were key factors in the game and that's why I conditioned the game with low serves only. In essence they did not cover the court too well when we were receiving and therefore could not build on their score. This goes back to point 1 and 3.

Paul


TBH i think Adcock and Ellis will be London Olympics Champions ! What do u guys think? They arrived at the Irish international in Baldoyle Badminton Centre and no one had a clue who they were…. But at the end of the tournament everyone thouht they were amazing…. because they beat Chris Landgrige and Anthony Clark Laugh Get in there guys!!!! Get in there!!!!!!

May 16, 2011
3:18 am
Avatar
Ray
Indonesia
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
April 14, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ed said:

Well Matt, just watch his matches on YouTube of the recent years. Look how many people surround him in the intervals (I'll give it to you, zero !). And on posts commented by Super/Astro Sport, the comentators mention it he has no coach. Just found this remarkable, and that's why I “followed” him a bit arround.

(Read this post just for info) All the best, ED


I read today that Wong Choong Hann will be Malaysia's second singles at the World Championships. His current ranking is World No. 16, sponsored by Dunlop Sports.

May 16, 2011
10:09 pm
Avatar
Paul Stewart
Cheshire, UK
Admin
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
February 15, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I’d be interested to know whether he chooses to go it alone by choice or other reasons. Behind the scenes there will be support for this player because I don’t believe you can “make it” without the right coaching and training.

If you have a good tactical brain then it’s perfectly feasible to play matches without a coach present. To be honest, I’m not keen on coaches sitting behind the court shouting at players. A player has to learn and they will gain more experience and think better without a coach present.

Paul

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 676

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Matthew Seeley: 391

Peter Warman: 239

Ed: 186

Dobbie98: 165

gingerphil79: 158

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 10

Members: 1532

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 2

Forums: 8

Topics: 581

Posts: 4716

Newest Members:

vishu08, t123, LucaSchlietz, ehsianturi, wkt_1

Moderators: Design: 0

Administrators: AngieS: 0, Paul Stewart: 1283