Yonex UK have introduced 6 new badminton rackets this year, following hot on the heels of the highly successful Arcsaber Z Slash.
Out of all the new rackets, the Yonex Arcsaber 8DX is the one I’ve been longing to get my hands on.
Arcsaber 8DX
As you would expect, the Arc8DX arrived with customary full length bag, standard amongst the Arcsaber range. The racquet is striking in appearance with a winning combination of red, silver, black and copper orange.
This particular model is only available in 3U (weight 85-89.9g) and grip size G3 (same as Arcsaber 10 & 7). This is the larger of the 2 grip sizes currently chosen by Yonex for UK market.
Immediately you pick this racket up, there’s something about it that talks quality. It’s a lovely balance, not too head heavy although you can feel a touch of weight in the head to get a little meat behind the shuttle. The balance is more even compared to Arcsaber 10.
As with most of the top Yonex racquets in the range, the Arcsaber 8DX has a stiff shaft, which is ideal for power players who need a faster response from their racquet.
Whilst material construction seems identical to other Yonex racquets in the range, the Arcsaber 8DX is designated a high tension racquet, with a maximum recommended string tension of 27lbs, which is 3lbs more than most racquets in the current range.
It’s well known that many of the Yonex sponsored players have been stringing their racquets way above recommended string tension values for years. Perhaps it’s a sign of the times that Yonex has finally introduced a racquet purporting to accept higher tensions, moreso to meet public demand from Asia for higher tensions. This is now creeping into UK and is a particular concern of mine. To play with high tensions, a player’s technique must be extremely good, otherwise injuries will occur.
On with the review…
The string tension on this racquet feels a little tighter so there was no need to arrange a re-string before testing. Readers of my reviews will know that I like to test racquets “straight out of the bag.”
From the first hit I knew I liked this racquet. Clears were sailing towards my opponents back line with very little effort on my part. The racquet oozed power but it wasn’t difficult to tame like Z Slash. It performed like a champion thoroughbread, giving me everything I wanted and more at the right time.
So, we know this racquet packs a mean punch, although not quite up to the hitting power of Z Slash. But, it’s got far greater consistency and control and that’s counts for so much more. What about in other areas of the court?
Defensively this racquet delivered every time and reminded me of the speed of my Nano9900 although not quite as light in the head. The combination of better aerodynamics and slightly lighter head work really well here. I could manoeuvre the racquet really fast without any drag or delay caused by additional weight in the head.
There’s always a trade-off between weight in the head for power, and a lighter head for speed, but Yonex seem to have got the combination just right for this racquet.
As you would expect, if the racquet delivers in defence, then it’s got to be good around the net. Yes, no surprises here, it was magnificent! I didn’t need to make adjustments for the racquet, it just played net shots or kills with ease and a fast recovery too. Exactly what I want from a racquet.
Will Arcsaber 8DX suit every style of play? Absolutely. But, that doesn’t mean it will suit your game. As you know, choosing a racquet is very personal and I can imagine for some there will a few frowns, possibly thinking the head lacks the weight to elevate it into the serious hitting league. That’s what personal taste is about.
I’d disagree with this kind of thinking as there are power players using very light-headed racquets. As for me, I consider Arcsaber 8DX to be an Arcsaber 10 with more edge, a little bit more alive and wanting to play. It’s the young kid on the block compared to the wise man – it almost encourages you to throw caution to the wind and play on the dangerous side.
Summary
As you can tell, I really like this racquet. Whilst it’s early in our relationship, I can’t wait to get back on court and do it all again. I haven’t felt this level of excitement about a racquet since Z Slash last year. However, I don’t have the frustration of timing issues this time around – it’s almost like taking your favourite racquet, giving it a paint job and handing it back to you with an armed and dangerous sticker attached!
With an RRP of £150, this is a pretty hefty price tag. No doubt the online discounters will be selling for considerably cheaper than that, so expect to pay around £130, maybe less. That’s still a lot of money for a racquet, which will turn many players away.
As much as I like this racquet, the price will push players away and therefore I need to reflect this in my scoring system. Consequently, I’ll rate this racquet 4.5 stars in my 5 star system.
For me, Arcsaber 8DX is close, if not right on the mark, on my Holy Grail of racquets chart. And that is saying a lot!
Dear Paul,
Have you systematically compared AS10 and AS8DX?
I looked at both these rackets a long time ago. It’s been so long since I used them I couldn’t compare now.
By the way, both of these rackets are being withdrawn by Yonex this year.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I have read your reviews on the arcsabers, the armortec and Voltric VT80 which you absolutely love. I play more of a control game using drops, clears, placements and smash only when required. I have been using the carbonex 20 2UG4 and carbonex 21 2UG4 racquets for a very long time with tensions around 21lbs. I have however developed a golfer’s elbow and those who play with me say that it could be because I use a lot of wrist and heavy racquets. I have tried the arc saber 10 3UG4, Armortec 900Technique 4UG4 at higher tensions, but those seem to aggravate my elbow condition. I felt the AS10 holding the shuttle too long on the string bed affecting my accuracy on the defensive returns. AT900T is close to what I like but at 4U 24lbs, I was putting in a lot of effort that I dont have to with my Carbonexes. I want your opinion on AS8DX if it can be suitable for me. However since I prefer stringing at 21-22 lbs would defeat the purpose of the AS8DX that is specified to be used at 27lbs. What other rackets would you suggest?
Thanks!
Many thanks for your email.
Let’s straighten a few things out for you.
The maximum recommended tension on ARC8DX is 27lbs. This does not mean you have to string to that tension. What it means is exceeding this figure will invalidate your warranty – so it is fine.
You are currently using 2U frames which are slightly heavier than most rackets on sale today, but only by a few grams.
Before you look at the racket as a cure for your elbow injury, can I suggest you see a coach. Tennis elbow can be caused by poor grip, excessively tight grip, poor technique so before you look to spend money on a racket i would rather you got expert opinion regarding your overall technique. Can I also suggest you see a physio with your injury and get some rest. Buying a new racket will not solve the problem so do this first. Otherwise your injury may become so bad you won’t be in a condition to play, regardless of what racket you have.
Good luck
Paul
Hi Paul,
Many thanks for your suggestion!
I will certainly check with the physio regarding the condition of my elbow and the probable reasons that might have led to the injury. I do know a coach that can help me with my technique.
Thanks again.
Saurabh
Paul,
I have cut my options to the Arcsaber 009DX and the Voltric 5. In your opinion, how do you feel they compare?
Dan.
Dan
They are very different. You’re choosing between an Arcsaber and a Voltric with different characteristics. You’ll have to test them to compare for yourself because the data I could give you is relative to me.
My personal preference would be Voltric 5 because I prefer head heavy racquets.
Paul
Thanks Paul,
I shall read the reviews later on. I have used my friends Nanoray 700 RP (I think), and it seemed pretty head light compared to my Arcsaber 8DX. Personally, I see why there has been lack of marketing for this racket however, that is my opinion.
Also, how does a racket with a stiff flex compare to a racket with medium flex racket?
Dan.
Dan
A racquet with stiff flex has less “whip” and therefore does not bend and then add additional momentum to the shot. For some players this is needed to provide additional power. These players tend to find stiff flex is like playing with a board. A stiff shaft still bends but not as much as a medium or flexible shaft. Therefore the other issue tends to be a slight variation in timing.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I am in the market of a new racket, I am currently using an Arcsaber 8DX. I am not asking which racket you recommend as you repeatedly tell readers not to ask so. However, I am asking for alternatives to an Arcsaber 8DX, so, a racket which has even balance and a stiff/er shaft. Preferably, I would like to get a racket in the range of £60-£100 with these type of characteristics.
Thanks, Dan.
Hi Dan
From the current range in UK, all I can suggest is Arcsaber 009DX or 008. You can read my reviews on these racquets.
I have a feeling the Nanoray series are a little more towards even balance than head light although I haven’t tested them yet to give you a more qualified answer.
Hope this helps.
To your success
Paul
Paul,
I have been using a Ti-10 and Muscle Power 100 for many years now but have been looking for replacement – something that combines the features of both racquets. I like the solid feel, large sweetspot and power of the Ti-10 but I don’t like the head heavy balance. On the other hand I love the MP100 for its even balance feel, stiff shaft/frame and power but don’t like its small sweetspot. I’ve been recommended the ArcSaber 8DX but looking at the slim isometric head shape I’m not sure if it has the large sweetspot that I want.
Can you offer any thoughts on this?
Thanks
SuperCNJ
The sweetspot on isometric frames is larger than conventional oval shaped racquets.
The size of the sweetspot on a racquet is determined by the tension of the strings. The higher the tension, the smaller the sweetspot. So, I guess the big question is what tension are you asking for?
To your success
Paul
Hi Paul,
thanks for the quick response.
I like playing with high tension strings in the region of 27lb (hence the 8DX) and string my own racquets so I know the tension should be relatively consistent. I understand the relationship between tension and sweetspot size, but assuming this as a constant factor across the MP100, Ti10 and 8DX. How would the 8DX fair against something like a Ti10 in terms of sweet spot size and stability on off-centre shots?
I made the transition to isometric frames some 11 years ago with the Ti10 after paying consistently with carbonex racquets for some 10 years before and loved the forgivingness of the Ti10 on off-centre shots. I realise the 8DX has a slimmer head and so is unlikely to have a sweetspot on par with the Ti10 but I was wondering if it is any better than the MP100 – which is quite unforgiving with it’s tiny sweetspot.
Many thanks! 🙂
Arcsaber 8DX can certainly take 27lbs tension.
Unless I’m missing something in my racquet education, I would expect the sweet spot of an isometric racquet to be fairly similar. The difference with your MP100 is that it wasn’t a stiff frame and therefore I would expect more torsion, although not much bearing in mind Yonex are pretty fanatical about it. Arcsaber 8DX is a very tough frame – I should know I’ve played with them for last 15 months.
Paul
Hey Paul,
If you recall I wrote to you explaining about my 8DX being cracked and it had been sent off to Yonex. Well, three weeks later I got lucky! Yonex had given me another 8DX absolutely free! I was amazed! I used it again the other night, and of course, it will take a bit of getting used to again, but great news indeed!
Many thanks
Dan
Hi Dan,
Fantastic news. I’m sure it won’t take you long to get used to it.
Paul
Hey Paul,
Thank you for your response,I guess I have to be more careful not to clash with my partner!
I shall buy a replacement (unless I am lucky), however I don’t really want to buy a racket which cost me thst much to get a crack in it. So, I am rather stuck on which racket to purchase… Do I buy another Arcsaber 8dx (which is a great racket), or another Arcsaber, or a Voltric? (The voltric range look fantastic!)
Anyway, I was just asking for your opinion 🙂
Many thanks,
Dan
Hi Dan
This is the problem with high-end racquets – if you break them, they cost a lot to replace.
At the end of the day only you can decide whether something like Voltric 5 will be a suitable replacement for your Arcsaber 8DX. For the price, you can buy 2 VT5’s and still have change from an Arc8DX. However, if you don’t like the racquet and it doesn’t have the right feel for you, then it’s wasted money.
As you know from my reviews, I love the Voltric series of racquets. They’re probably the best Yonex has ever made, but that doesn’t mean they suit your style, technique, physique and muscle structure. Please, read reviews with an understanding that the reviewer will see things in a racquet that you won’t. Whilst I try to give a balanced view of a racquet, it still doesn’t mean you would share the same view.
Let me know what you choose to do.
Paul
Hey, I recently went into a shop to re string my Arcsaber 8DX and I got a phone call saying there was a crack in my racket (?!). I went to the shop to collect it, and the crack was in the exact same place as the clamp on the machine to string rackets. I said I had never seen the crack before. The shop decided to send it to Yonex but the shop said they are 99% sure I won’t get a replacement. If I don’t get one from Yonex, what shall I do?
Thanks
Many thanks for your question.
I’ve seen this before. I doubt the stringers machine caused the crack. There are places on the frame where the likelihood of a crack appearing are high. These places generally are at 10 o’clock and 2 o’clock positions or lower down at 20 past and 20 to positions. Most stringing machines have clamps at these positions – look at Yonex own stringing machine to see this.
Unfortunately, if a racquet has a crack, most of the time it is due to a collision or the racquet has been strung way beyond it’s recommended tension and therefore has broken at it’s weakest spot. Either way you won’t get a replacement from Yonex. In cases like these, it’s unlikely you’d get a replacement from any manufacturer.
When asked, most players can’t remember clashing racquets. However I’ve watched players smash the frame on the floor trying to retreive a smash and then deny they connected with the floor at all.
Sorry to say, unless you are very lucky you’re going to have to buy another racquet.
To your success
Paul
Hi Paul,
I am new to your dashboard. i recently bought ARC 8dx and am started to use with it. my personal feel about the racket . control and net drop and defense are 100% perfect . regarding smash i felt it is slow, as well as i got shoulder pain paul. till now i am playing with plastic shuttle. now i have switched over to feather shuttle. could you please suggest me the string tension and grip which i have to use as well as the string. for clear and backhand i putting lot of effort do it. so please help me to resolve my issues. thanks in advance.
Present configuration:
Racket:8dx
string:nano98
tension:23lbs
grip :cushion
thanks,
Mohan
Hi Mohan
Many thanks for your question.
There is no reason why the racquet should give you such a stiff shoulder unless you have made adjustments to your technique.
I don’t know which racquet you used prior to purchasing the Arcsaber 8DX. Was it stiff shafted racquet or flexible? This can make a difference as your timing may have changed.
Personally I think 23lbs tension on a racquet that is used to hit plastic shuttles is too high. There are always exceptions to this but I believe you thump a plastic and stroke a feather.
I have seen damage to shoulders and arms primarily caused by a combination of incorrect technique and too high tension. This could be the situation with you.
What I suggest you do is find a coach and explain what’s happened. A good coach should be able to advise and correct for you.
Let me know what happens.
To your success
Paul
Hi Paul,
I consider myself to be a fairly athletic intermediate player. I’m about 220lbs, and in decent shape. I can hit harder than most, but try to save my shoulder as I’m into my 40’s now.
I’ve recently purchased an 8dx after having played for some time with a fairly poor $30 racquet. My new dx is strung at 27 pounds, probably close to 10 pounds more than my old racquet. It feels maybe a little too high tension. How much difference do you think there would be if I had it re-strung at around 24-25 pounds. I’ll play with it for awhile before I make any changes.
Also while I’m at it. I was interested in the Voltric 70, due to all the rave reviews and cool technology. What most intrigues me is the idea of the flexible shaft. Can a person generate good power from a flexible racquet with less effort than with a stiff racquet? My understanding is that stiffer racquets like the 8dx can generate more power with the right input, but I’m talking about just good power….not the most power. I’d like to save my shoulder for a few more games, but still have the ability to smash decently.
Thanks,
Brad
Hi Brad
Many thanks for your questions.
The difficulty with such a massive increase in string tension is that you are certainly placing a lot more strain on your technique and joints. If you’re playing with plastic shuttles then I’d urge you to lower your tensions fast. With feathers, you may find you’ve gone one step too far. Personally I’d drop to 23lbs and test again. Expect your racquet to feel a bit spongy follwing the high tension but you may find you hit consistently better. It may be that you find you’ve got so accustomed to the high tension you cannot play with a lower tension. At the end of the day, string tension is another very individual area.
Voltric 70 is a powerful racquet. The current All England Mens Doubles Champion Mogenson changed from a stiff Nano9900 to Voltric 70 and I’d say he’s hitting just as hard, if not harder. Again, it’s an individuals choice but it worked for him. I’m going to change from 8DX to Voltric 80 when my contract is renewed.
Your question regarding flexibility on the shaft is a good one. Some players prefer the addtional flex to assist in power generation. Really powerful players generally choose stiff shafts because they don’t need the additonal flex which can hinder timing of the hit. They prefer the racquet to follow their arm rather than bend too much and create a delay in the timeline of the shot. I don’t know whether this will work for you or not, however my guess would be that if you’re not an out and out power player, the medium flex shaft could assist you in generating the power you are looking for.
Hope this helps.
To your success.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I’m coming to the point where my old NS9000X (does Yonex even make these still? They aren’t on their website) is about to wither from the test of time, and I need a new racquet. Would the ArcSaber 8DX be a good switch from the NS9000X? They’re both Stiff and light-headed (from what I could tell from your review, unless I’m mistaken), and the 8DX is more of a defensive racquet.
I would go for the NS9900, but after using Nanospeed for quite some time, I think I would like to try something new.
I enjoy the ability to control the shuttle, and prefer defensive over attacking, would the 8DX be good for me, or would you recommend a different racquet?
Thanks,
Kevin
Hi Kevin
I receive 5-6 emails like your every day. The truth of the matter is that there’s a point with a player where they need to test a few racquets and decide what they like. You are at that stage.
NS9000 was a popular racquet superceded by NS9900. If you believe you’d like to try something different then test a few Arcsabers. I’d also suggest Voltrics. I’ve just tested VT7 and would liken it to NS9900 but with more weight in the head, although not as heavy as AT900P.
Arc8DX is a superb racquet and does display some of the properties found in NS range, certainly for speed.
Hopefully you can have a hit with another playhers racquet and judge for yourself.
To your success
Paul
PS Le me know what you choose
Thanks Paul,
My local store doesn’t allow for testing, so I’ll probably look and see if any friends have the 8DX. If I can’t find anyone, I’ll just go back to Nanospeed.
Yes, borrowing form friends and club players seems to be the only way for most players as very few shops have demo racquets.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I need a backup racket as my partner broke my armortec900power last week, now all I’m left with is my Armortec 700 (the new one)… I like the Armortec 700 for singles, a lot, it really suits my style, but in doubles, its a bit slow for fast drives… I tried the Ti 10 but it was a bit too light, Armortec 900 Technique seems a good option now, but I have one of those and would like a double of either the 700 or the technique. Right now I’m mainly playing doubles in my school, but I don’t know, the technique doesn’t have that element of whippyness that the 700 has, and I really miss that, is there a head heavy racket with a long shaft that you would reccomend for BOTH singles and doubles?
Derek
Apologies for my delay in responding to your comment, I missed it on my emails.
AT700 has been a big seller for singles players, mainly because it was Lin Dan’s racquet. As a doubles racquet, there’s been mixed reviews, primarily because of the head weight as you so rightly mention.
The closest I see to your requirements at the moment is Voltric 70. Please read my review. It combines head weight with a medium flex shaft and Nano9900 type frame. It would help to be able to test one because of the price and also because you need to comfortable with it.
Expect a few more Voltrics to enter UK market following this years All England Championships. This will include the VT80 which will have the same features as VT 70 except it will be a stiffer version.
There is some weight in Z Slash too but the smaller head has proved a problem for many players. Again, test as much as you can prior to spending your money.
Let me know what you choose.
Paul
I chose 8DX. Tried it once and like it! Very easy to get used to it, even for the first game with this racket.
Paul,
I’m considering between 8DX and Arc10. From your experience on these 2 rackets, can you say more about the differences? It would be nice if you could compare the drop precision/net play/halfcourt smash of these 2 rackets. thx!
Brown
Both are good all round racquets. For me the Arc 8DX tips the balance due to its extra rigidity and better aerodynamic performance.
With regard to on court performance, I found 8DX that little bit faster in defence and around the net without compromising smashing power. Both racquets are capable of delivering precision shots – this element is more down to the user than the racquet itself.
I hope this helps and please let me know which you choose.
To your success
Paul
Thanks for all your help, Paul. I went with the Arc8DX.
Thanks for your advice. Is the stiffness about the same as the AT900P?
Kounter
If you like AT900P, then you should really like 8DX. I would say stiffness is similar although I feel 8DX may be stiffer. Let me know what you decide on.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I was considering getting an Arc8DX. I currently use the AT900Power, but I find that it’s a little too head heavy for my liking. My strengths are smashing, clears, deceptive drops, and drives. I play more doubles than singles, and I’m usually at the back delivering smashes. I was also considering the Nanospeed 9900 and AT900T. I was wondering which one you think would fit my playing style the best? Also, how does the stiffness of the Arc8DX compare to the AT900Power and Technique?
Thanks.
Kounter
I think of Arcsaber 8DX as an Armortec 900P without the extra weight in the head. It’s also more aerodynamic so great for both singles and doubles.
Many of the Yonex sponsored players prefer a head heavy racquet to head light. But, it’s all down to personal preference. If you’ve got great technqiue and naturally good power, then either Nano9900 or Arc 8DX would be very good choices.
I believe Yonex will soon be phasing out Armortec series so I wouldn’t be too keen to buy a racquet that has a limited shelf life.
Hope this helps.
Paul
For me, it is the worse racket i EVER USED.
really no feel and it was so heavy compere to my Apacs rackets
im a wrist player and i found this racket so uncomfortable…
so as you all can see you choose rackets by YOUR feel and not reviews
Dory
A lot of players like to read reviews. I have always said my personal tastes will be different from any other players. I love and use Arcsaber 8DX racquets and find them extremely good as an all rounder racquet.
Your personal tastes are different and that’s fine too. I’ve never played with an Apacs racquet so can’t comment on them. I also don’t get sent free racquets to review so have to wait for my retailer to buy new stock to be in a position to test a racquet.
Reviews will continue to feature on my website because a lot of players like them. Sometimes they’re a guide especially when the player knows I’ve used a lot of racquets and can therefore compare them.
Paul
Thanks Paul, I think I will get the Arcsaber 100 (same as the 7, but with more panache)…
Paul thank you for the review, 8DX sounds awesome. I have just gotten back into the game, having played it throughout my schooling days (albeit in the streets without a proper net), and I am in the market for a new, good racket. I think I am and advanced beginner (i can hit clears etc from baseline to baseline, backhand is ok, can smash and return smashes), my biggest weakness is my footwork.
I want to get the 8DX but the only thing putting me off is the shaft stiffness. I gym (bench 185lbs for reps) and play golf, but I am not sure if I can flex it enough to get the most out of it. Is it a very demanding racket due to its stiffness? Does it suit advanced players only or can someone who is kinda familiar with the game, with a strong forearm and ok wrist use this racket to its full potential? Let me know!
Thanks, V
Hi V
Thanks for your comment.
8DX is a superb racquet. With your strength I wouldn’t expect you would have too many problems. However, 8DX is not a racquet I would choose for a player with limited experience. Personally, I would select a racquet with more flex in the shaft like Arcsaber 7 until you believe you’ve reached a level where you have a lot more consistency.
Hope this helps.
Paul
I recently obtained the 8DX as a replacement/spare for my Z-slash. Even though the Z-slash is really powerfull and easy to clear with I was never really happy with it. It did help me clear with less effort and smash better/harder but I didn’t like it at the net or in defensive and I thought it wasn’t very accurate. (Could be my playing ofc).
The 8DX changes all that, it gives me great confidence at the net without sacrificing too much power. Netshots, drops and defense are all better but I may still turn back to the Z-slash for a tough single when I need some help.
This comes from an average clubplayer so ymmv.
Joost
The reason I chose 8DX over Z Slash was that I wanted consistency in a racquet. Whilst I really like Z Slash, and it really is powerful, it was too inconsistent for me.
The 8DX however is a fantastic racquet and really delivers for me. For some it may feel too stiff, but I absolutely love it.
Paul
What you will find is that the weight in Z Slash is at the top of the head, so in some respects it’s more like AT900Power than Arc 10. Also, the longer shaft adds an element of whippyness to the feel rather than the stiff shaft of Arc 10.
So, in essence it’s neither like Arc 10 or Arc8DX.
Paul
Oh I see. Would you say that the Z Slash is more like the Arc 10 cause of it’s weight or Arc8DX? I am itching to get my hands on a Z Slash.
To make it clearer…the Arcsaber 8DX is so far the best racquet I’ve used and Ive always been wanting to try the Z slash to compare to the NS9900 and Arcsaber 8DX.
Great comments and I an glad you like Arc 8dx so much.
Z Slash has more weight in the head and longer shaft. This makes the racquet powerful especially with the aerodynamic qualities of the head.
But the combination doesn’t work in all area for some. Defensively it is quick but you can feel the weight in the head.
8dx actually feels more solid.and faster in defence and around the net. It is far more consistent. If you can tame ZSlash then it may be a harder hitter.
Hope this helps.
Paul
Hello Paul. I have had the Arcsaber 8DX for about a month now with BG68Ti at 24lb. It’s a fabulous racquet and I seem to draw extremely good smashes from it and defense along with it..but I am dying to see how it compares to the Arcsaber Z Slash. I have the Nanospeed 9900 and Arc10 and from what I noticed, the Arc8DX has a longer smash and compared to the Arc10, it is a much better racquet and in comparison to the NS9900 which was my partner for 6 months, I find that I get more power with the Arc8DX but much better defense with the NS9900. Does the Arc Z Slash compare to any of my results from above? I am a doubles and learning singles player and I am mainly a drop, control, and definetely smashing type of player.
Hi Paul
I’ve a question. When is the video review? Just a question
Greets
Lukas
The video is partially done. We finish filming next Monday and then we will need to edit. It is our first full video review so bear with us. I do want to get this right. It is not easy arranging court time especially as we are filming the first video for our online coaching program.
Paul
Wait this review a long time.
In my opinion, the most important upgrade is the higher tension.(3U/27lbs 2U 28lbs) It’s an official identify.
However, it’s higher price…that really will turn many player away.
In my country the price is the same as Arc 10….
That’s a shame.
Arc 8DX is selling for around £120 online which is a lot cheaper than Arc 10. It’s a classic case of retailers trying to cash in on the new racquet where demand will be higher.
Whether Yonex will take the same stance with other racquets in the future regarding higher tension will be interesting.
My money is on a new racquet launch at Japan Open so I’m sure the string tension issue will be high on the agenda. Maybe they’ll bring out the “new improved, stronger” version of the exisitng range so they bring them into line?
Paul