There’s been a tremendous amount of traffic on the forums about this racquet. I can’t remember a time when a new racquet was so eagerly awaited. Yonex Japan website enticed us with their advertising, however, they kept us all in the dark about the looks of this racquet until a few days before launch.
When pictures were available, the racquet met with mixed response. Some said it was ghastly whilst others raved over its colourful graphics. But, did it live up to the hyped anticipation and expectation? Let’s get into the review. Above all else, please remember that choosing a racquet is personal and you are the only person to judge whether this racquet is for you.
With all the hype surrounding this racquet, I was expecting a flashy cover – something different to set it apart from the rest of the Yonex range. As you can imagine, I was a bit disappointed when I saw the standard Arcsaber racquet cover. Fair play to Yonex though, they are trying to standardise their range so, in some ways, why should this racquet get special treatment?
I had that Christmas morning feeling as I slowly unzipped the cover and pulled out the racquet. Wow! I was met by the most striking graphics I’ve seen on a racquet for some time. If you’re ultra conservative, you may see the racquet as flash or gawdy but I really liked it. The graphics combine black, red, yellow, gold and white.
At first glance, apart from the graphics, this looks like any other racquet. But, there are a number of differences when investigated further.
First off, the head looks slightly thinner. Initially I thought this was due to the stringing. But, Yonex stringers are amongst the best in the world so this needed closer inspection. No, this is definitely a slightly different shape, drawing in from the sides by approximately half a centimetre each side, which is considerable. The head length is the same.
The shaft is approximately 1cm longer than my Nanospeed 9900 which should therefore generate a bit more power. The handle is around 2cm shorter and ferrule (plastic piece above the handle) reduced by around 25% (my estimation.) The ferrule itself looks considerably smaller and is a slightly different shape. Personally, I can’t see this adding much, if anything, to the racquet’s performance, although I’m sure the marketers will tell you differently.
The racquet is a standard 3U (weight 84-89g) with grip size G4. This is a little surprising as usually in UK we get grip size G3 which is slightly larger. Yonex have previously supplied larger grip sizes to our market as they consider we have larger hands. So, I can’t understand why this top-of-the-range racquet is supplied with the smaller grip size. Let’s move on…
So how does this racquet feel? Certainly it’s different from Arcsaber 10. It’s almost a cross between Armortec 900 Power (which readers will know is a particular favourite of mine) and Nanospeed 9900 (my current racquet).
It’s certainly well balanced although I’d say there’s leaning towards more weight in the head. Prior to heading out of the door, I put a grip on the racquet and couldn’t resist a few swishes in my front room. Wow! The speed through the air was amazing. Certainly a lot less “drag” than other racquets. This racquet certainly felt fast for power shots which was a surprise, bearing in mind the heavier head. It’s going to be interesting to see how it delivers both in terms of overhead power and defence.
I used the racquet this evening in a training night at my league club. First off I played a game of men’s doubles. In the warm up I felt pretty good about the racquet although knew it was going to take some getting used to.
Why?
The racquet is certainly solid enough. My touch was slightly off, but that was partly due to the lower string tension and me having to adapt to the racquet. The slightly heavier head was noticeable although it was certainly fast around the net.
Where this racquet scores big time, is when you actually time the stroke properly. The shuttle then travels like a bullet and all the comments about how powerful this racquet is can be believed. In the warm up I hit a few good smashes that went down like a shell – fantastic, I’m ready for the game now.
Wrong! Getting my timing right in the warm up did not prepare me for the speed of the game at all. I found that, even with my experience, I was mis-timing so many overheads. Whilst I stuck at it, we lost the game easily which was disappointing.
I then did some feeding with the racquet and it felt really good. Lots of underarm feeding was a piece of cake. I was still very conscious of the weight in the head of the racquet and felt very comfortable with it.
Following this, I worked with the players on defence. Having previously been the feeder, I was very keen to get involved as a player and try the racquet. I was delighted with the results. This racquet was really solid in defence moving very quickly to respond to the shuttle. The extra weight in the head felt great and gave me that additional kick in high lifts to get a good length, even when digging shuttles out of my racquet hip.
Following this we did some fast hands work around the net. Again, I was delighted with the racquet. It was certainly fast enough in this department with the added “meat” and consequently control I’ve missed when using my Nanospeed 9900.
Sadly, I didn’t get to play another game – I’ll have to wait for next week.
To sum up my evening, the racquet performed like a trouper in all departments except my overhead – the place where it’s supposed to shine brightest. I really was delighted with all the areas we tested, and boy we tested hard tonight.
I’ve read with interest from the badminton forums the comments made by players who have purchased this racquet and found it’s not suited them. I can fully understand the frustrations from these players as I guess I was having exactly the same feelings early in the night.
This is a brilliant racquet, no doubt about it. So, why I can’t I play with it immediately? The answer is simple…
This is a pedigree racquet that requires coaxing into greatness. When you time your shot right, this beauty delivers power in abundance. And here lies the crux of the matter…”when.” This racquet takes more getting used to than any I’ve used before.
Maybe it’s the combination of longer shaft, shorter handle and smaller head? Maybe it’s the aero-dynamic head that moves so fast when asked to perform in this manner – it’s almost too good for me right now.
Having thought more about what I’ve just written, I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s the racquets ability to generate such magnificent speed through the air which is catching me out and throwing my timing. When I master this, I believe I will tame this beast and be able to get the best from it.
I also lent this racquet to other players this evening. The looks on their faces when they timed a smash were a sight to see. I witnessed some awesome smashing with this racquet tonight. But, these huge smashes were a very small percentage out of the many hit during the evening.
How am I going to rate this racquet? RRP is around £180 which places it as the most expensive Yonex racquet on the market. It’s possibly the most expensive Yonex racquet ever! Is it worth it? Only you can tell.
Personally, for many players it will be out of reach. Maybe not from a price perspective, but more so in terms of what they can get out of it. An average league player can do better by choosing their next racquet wisely, rather than thinking the most expensive is the best racquet for them.
Having said all of that, and despite me not making a marriage proposal on our first date, I really do love this racquet. I want to spend more time with it, get to know it better and find out how to make us a perfect partnership.
This racquet has bowled me over. I don’t exactly know why, but I’m itching to test it again, and again and want to master the overhead timing and see what this beauty can really deliver. I can’t wait for our next date.
I can’t remember the last time a racquet had this effect on me. So despite the immediate negative aspect which I think is due to the astonishing speed through the air this racquet generates, I am going to rate this racquet at 4.5 stars. I really believe this racquet has the potential to be a classic, if it can be tamed. I’ve deducted half a star because of the price although must confess that this could become withdrawn completely and changed to a 5 star rating when I get used to the awesome power this racquet generates.
I may have to write an additional review on this racquet when I’ve had a little more time with it. Watch this space…




{ 28 comments… read them below or add one }
Tks for the review, it helps me to decide if I shld get it. Like you I also have the AT900P and NS9900(which am currently using). Love the NS9900 but thought of giving the Z-Slash a try. Price here is much cheaper compare to the UK, it’s only HKD1291 for the SP model. The JP model is over HKD1800. Is it true that the JP model is much heavier compare to SP?
What do you think?hello i just asking wat racket is good 2 smash plz help me?
Hi James
Welcome to my blog and thank you for your question.
From all of the rackets I’ve tried the clear winner for me is Arcsaber Z Slash. I could generate more power with that racket compared to the other Yonex rackets I’ve tested.
I don’t know which racket will best suit you and give you the result you want. Test as many rackets as you can and let me know which one gave you the best smash.
To your success in 2010
Paul
Hi Jason
Thanks for your comments.
I’ve not had the pleasure of trying a JP version, only UK version, and therefore cannot answer your question.
It wouldn’t make much sense to introduce a racket and then make a “special” version just for one market. The cost of production would be a lot higher. And, if they did, what would they add to this racket to make it any better?
I understand that one of the most expensive areas of production is the laser etching of serial numbers. At the end of the day, this is an anti-fraud addition to the racket, although it doesn’t stop the trade in fake rackets.
Sorry I can’t help futher on this one. If I do manage to test a JP version, I’ll post my findings on my blog and let you know.
To your success.
Paul
Thanks Paul
Agree with you on that, I dun get why they wanna hv diff. versions as well. And the price differences is big, most people wld just go for the cheaper ones. I’ve never tested myself and only hearsay that it’s heavier.
Again thanks for all the tips n reviews.
Hi Paul,
I spent an enjoyable evening reading the stuff on your site.
Looking forward to more comparison between these rackets when you get the chance. What will you choose for yourself and what will you recommend for different kinds of player? Interesting to know.
I\’m in Belgium. The slow shuttle problem is here as well. People don\’t get what those little marks are on the tramlines and they don\’t care to have it explained to them…
All the best and keep going.
Al
Al
Many thanks for your kind comments. Having just returned from club and lost my games in 3, you brought a smile to my face…I don’t like to lose!
When I next review a new racket, I am going to do a video review rather than a wrttien review. I may have to wait a while for a new racket to be launched in UK.
Sorry you’ve also got a shuttle speed problem. And yes, that’s a pretty common attitude in UK too.
Keep in touch.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I’m using Armortec 900 Power, which I restrung on 27lbs. I want to ask if the Arcsaber Z-Slash could withstand 26lbs, because my money could be wasted in stringing the racket too much. I also want to ask if what is the best string appropriate for the Z-Slash, considering that I’m a more hard-hitter.
Hoping for your response,
Joseph
Hi Joseph
The AT 900 Power is a great racket, I know, that was my first racket with Yonex.
Across most of the range, Yonex recommends 24lbs tension on a racket. That doesn’t mean the pros don’t exceed this because they do. But they don’t pay for their rackets.
You haven’t had a problem with your AT900 have you, and 24lbs is the recommended tension for that racket too.
Bear in mind that when recommended tensions are exceeded, then you void your warranty.
There are lots of manufactures now looking carefully at this. Some have chosen higher recommended tensions, others around 24lbs. I know of a manufacturer that has 30lbs recommended tension on their racket. And yet, a professional stringer was stringing a new one at 25lbs and the racket broke.
The debate over string tension will continue. Players are pushing for higher tensions. We are now entering squash racket tensions and these rackets have much thicker frames than badminton.
My concern here, and no disrespect to you, league players and kids are copying. The problem and danger here is that most of these players haven’t the technique to cope with and get the best out of the racket at this tension. Consequently, injuries occur.
String choice is an interesting one. I spoke with the stringer at the English Nationals. He confirmed that the most popular string for the players was Yonex BG80 and in second place was Yonex BG65Ti.
Whilst you may be a big hitter, what is the most important criteria for you regarding string? Do you want better feel or are you more interested in endurance?
You see Yonex BG80 is the no1 string used by the pros. But, it doesn’t matter how often they break strings because they get the restring at the tournament.
Personally, I prefer Yonex BG65Ti. It’s a slightly thicker string compared to BG80 and therefore has slightly more durability. That said, if you’re a hard hitter and mishit, then the chances are you will break a string.
If you change to a thicker string than BG65Ti then you lose the performance characteristics and your racket may feel “dull” in comparison.
After all is said and done, you do need to test and decide for yourself what suits your game. Sorry to say, it’s usually an expensive test. What I would do is talk to your stringer. A good one will work with you and give you a discount because they understand the testing process.
OK Joseph I think I’ve covered everything. Feel free to email me with your questions.
Thanks Paul,
Regarding strings, which is better: Yonex Nanogy 98 or BG80?
Well said,
Hi Joseph
I’d have to say BG80 is by far the most popular string with the pros and top players. Second favourite is Yonex BG65Ti.
But, the best string is the one you prefer and not others. You may find Nanogy string better for your rackets and style of game.
If you can, I’d test each string at the same tension and then you are in a position to decide for yourself.
It’s very important to choose your own path in sport and not necessarily follow the majority. Test strings and tensions your way, with a little guidance. Make decisions based on how you feel, and please be careful not to be led by hearsay, ego and copying the pros.
To your success.
Paul
after the using nanospeed 9900 and arcsaber z slash, if both rackets are broken and u need to buy a new racket, which model will u buy ?
thanks.
max
Hi Max
That’s a really tough question! Do i go with Nano 9900 as it’s the one I’m using this season or take the plunge and use Z Slash.
I thought about teasing you with my answer and say that I’d think about it over the holidays. But, that wouldn’t be fair would it.
So, if I really had to make a choice, I think I take my game into adventureland and choose Z Slash.
Paul
me too. that’s what i’ve ended up doing
happy new year
Al
Enjoy your Z Slash.
Happy New Year to you too!
Paul
Hey Paul,
Happy New year and thanks for the review.
I just ordered a Z slash, I haven’t played with it before I ordered it, just read a view reviews and comparisons. I’ve tried the nano9900 en 9000 series, I liked it but my intuition told me to buy the Z slash.
So I hope I receive it soon (bought it online here in the Netherlands) and let you know how I feel about it!
greetz,
Elwin
Hi Elwin
Happy New Year.
I hope you’ll love the Z Slash as much as I do. Whilst I’m still using Nano 9900, it’s very likely that I’ll switch rackets at the end of the season. There’s no point switching mid-season.
Keep in touch and please let me know if there any particular topics you’d like covered on a video or article.
To your success in 2010.
Paul
Hi Paul,
I played with my Z slash this friday and first thing I noticed was a timing issue while smashing/clearing/ and some backhands. The harder I wanted to smash, the more I felt I had to adjust my timing. Because the way it sweeps, was just so quick. But yes, when hitting it ‘on the spot’ the speed of the shuttle was amazing. So I played a few games ( no competition) and I really had to get used to the racquet but I was satisfied with my own overall performance with this racquet. It gave me some extra power and therefore I played a bit more aggresive then I’m used to.
So I quess I found myself a new ‘partner’ , it’s not an easy racquet, I made more forced errors then usual, but I think it’s gonna work out well the more I play with it!
greetings,
Elwin
Hi Elwin
Your story is very familiar. You’ve probably read my posts on this fantastic racket. The Z Slash certainly takes some getting used to. But, if you persevere, I do beleive you will be rewarded.
Many thanks for your comment and let me know how you two are getting on in a few weeks time.
Paul
i bought z slash few weeks ago and string it at 28lb…… great racket to use…. i might add.. best racket i ever used.
Hi Max
Congratulations on your purchase.
The Arcsaber Z Slash is a great racket and I hope you see a significant improvement in your game using this racket.
Paul
hai there paul, i owned a z-slash for 2 months only an the frame bent when i mishit a smash a few days ago. when i checked carefully i found out that the bending area came from the paint chip which i had it when the racket clashed wit my friend’s racket weeks ago. my tension is only at 23lbs. is it due to the thinner frame that the durability is reduced? cos i’m thinking of getting a new arc z. or should i get an armortec because the frame is thicker n more durable. hope u can give some opinions. thanks for your time Paul. have a nice day
Hi David
Welcome to my blog and thank you for your comment.
I’m sorry to read of the demise of your racket. As you know rackets are meant to hit shuttles and not other rackets.
Recently, my Nano 9900 broke in a game of mixed doubles. My partner inexplicably decided that the shuttle up the middle of the court was better being struck on her weak high backhand rather than my forehand smash.
Sometimes, it’s not about whether a frame is weak or not, it’s about the angle of the collision. All top-end rackets are made of similar materials and therefore they are subject to breakage from a collision.
If you like the Z Slash and it’s improved your game, why would you want to get any other racket? Your decision should be based around the results you have got from Z Slash compared to other rackets. If they are superior, then buy another Z Slash. If there is no difference, then you’ve got to question whether it’s a good investment for you.
I’ve said so many times in my reviews that rackets are personal. What suits one is awful to another. Choose on what is right for you rather than the headlines. There’s no question the Z Slash is a good racket. The big question is how much it’s done for you?
Hope this helps with your decision. Let me know what you choose to do.
To your success
Paul
thanks for the advice Paul. Really appreciates it. i think i\’ll get another z-slash cos i really love the power n speed of this racket. =)
Hello Paul,
Thanks for your detailed review of the new Arcsaber Z-Slash.
I have been considering buying it for a while now and have been trying to get as much feedback on it from players as possible.
For your reference I have been using the Armotech 900 P with a string tension of 24lbs (BG80).
I have a few questions which I hope you don’t mind answering:
1) What are the main/biggest differences I will notice between these two rackets?
2) How do they compare in terms of power/smashing? Is there a noticeable difference?
3) Where is the cheapest place to buy one? I have seen some on Ebay which are supposedly genuine but am scared about getting fakes! e.g. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300358223338&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
4) What are the different types I keep on hearing about e.g. SP, JP etc ? What are the differences between them?
Thanks,
Mark
Hi Mark
Many thanks for your questions.
I’ve used the AT900P a lot, it’s a great racket. I’ve also extensively tested the Z Slash and will be using it in a match tonight, so I do feel qualified in answering your questions. I also have my AT900P in my bag tonight so will be playing with that too.
At900P is a solid head-heavy racket. It’s powerful and responsive. The Z Slash differs because of a number of factors:
1) It has a slightly longer shaft and therefore there is more flex.
2) The construction of Z Slash makes it incredibly fast cutting through the air to deliver power. You could notice a difference in your timing is required to get the best from this racket. Expect mishits to begin with.
3) The racket head on Z Slash is slightly thinner and there is slightly less string area. Potentially, this means you won’t need to string it as tight to get the same result as a higher tension in your AT900P. Again, it’s not much, but makes a difference. This part of the racket is easy to adjust to.
When you master Z Slash, i believe it delivers more smashing power than AT900P. It’s probably a little slower in defence because of the longer shaft, but over time you can improve your hand speed to compensate. There’s very little difference when playing at the net.
Ebay is a notoriously bad place to buy Yonex rackets. Many are fakes. Also, if you do not buy a UK registered racket and you have problems, Yonex UK will not assist you whatsoever in any kind of exchange.
If you buy from abroad, you also have to remember that your parcel is liklely to be stopped at customs and a surcharge levied. Any goods inward to UK with a value greater than £18 (don’t quote me on this figure) may be subject to import duty. I’ve brought goods in from USA in the past and paid some heavy duty fees, so be careful.
When Yonex create a racket they give them serial numbers (an expensive process I am told). Part of the serial number relates to the country it is due to be shipped to although that is now in question as SP versions (Singapore) are being sold to USA. I don’t have an up-to-date policy from Yonex to know what all this means.
JP versions (Japan) are said by some to be better than SP versions. As I understand it, there is no such thing as a China version so there’s a big clue when you look at ebay.
I can only assume that UK version is virtually the same as SP version but haven’t a clue what the difference is compared to JP version. At the time of writing, I don’t know how many other serial prefixes are used.
Most Yonex rackets are made in Japan, with the exception of some, but not all, of the lower end range.
If you live in North West UK, then contact me and I can arrange a demo session for you. If not, check out local stockists from Yonex website and ask them if they have demos (sadly not many do).
I suppose the big online badminton shops may be a good bet to get excellent deals. I don’t think but cannot confirm whether they have demo models for you to try.
Personally, I’d try before committing £150 + on a racket. You may not like Z Slash and then it’s money well saved.
Yonex will be releasing new rackets this year. I suspect only one of the new releases will potentially fall into your radar and that is Arcsaber 8DX although it’s not confirmed yet when or if it is coming into UK. More news will be available shortly.
Hope this helps a little. Feel free to either comment again or email me direct.
To your success.
Paul
Paul,
I really appreciate your help, I certainly feel it has made my mind up as to what I will do.
I live in Reading. I am fortunate enough to live fairly near a Yonex dealer whom I go to regularly for re-stringing as I break my BG 80 strings within a few months.
They sell the Arcsaber for £162 and they do allow demos. I inquired about how the demos work. It’s £10 deposit for the week which goes towards the cost of the racket if I decide to buy it.
The demo Z-Slash he has is stung with BG65 TI @ 17lbs, so I have asked if he would be wiling to restring it with BG80 @ 24lbs.
He said he will do that
So thanks to your insightful words I will demo it and see how I get on.
Hi Mark
Good to hear of a retailer using demo rackets. There are not many of them around.
Best of luck with your test. Please let me know how you find the Z Slash.
To your success.
Paul
You must log in to post a comment.