Background
The original Hypernano 800 was introduced in 2015. Then in 2016 Victor surprisingly introduced two limited edition 800’s, Power and Control. They have slightly different specifications and it’s unclear how limited these rackets are going to be. Are they limited for 2016 or a quantity? Interestingly there are a number of players I’ve seen using the Power version, which is encouraging.
The Hypernano range is designed to replace the Meteor range which has been very popular amongst international and club players. The Hypernano is considered an all-around racket i.e. not too head heavy and more even balance.
On to my review
The Hypernano X 800 Power arrived in the black racket bag with the Limited Edition Hypernano branding. Readers of my reviews will know my thoughts on these type of bags…they’re not the best covers for high-end rackets. However, graphics are good and they do add some protection to the frame rather than it scraping other frames in the bag.
HX800 power is a great-looking racket in a royal blue and yellow combination – very striking. Unlike the original 800 which had a matt black finish, Victor have opted for the shiny silk finish which looks great. This is a 3U version (85-89g) G5, small grip. The racket arrived unstrung so I selected my favourite string Ashaway Zymax Fire 66 and restrung to 25lbs This is a slight head heavy frame and 4/5 rating for shaft stiffness and feels really good.
It’s hitting time
Compared to the original HX 800, there is a definite difference in feel and performance. Hypernano 800 Power is a stiffer frame. There is noticeably more head weight and there’s a good solid feel in the hit, rather than the glassier, hollow feel of the original. If I had to find a comparison, I would suggest the racket is closer to Yonex Armortec 900 Power in feel.
Overhead performance
It’s rare that I have the luxury of comparing two rackets so closely having both in my bag at the same time. My first few hits with Hypernano 800 Power were really good and brought a smile to my face. This was very familiar feel for me. There’s certainly a huge difference in stiffness which was nice although for my personal taste these days it’s possibly too stiff. The frame is fast and there’s that lovely feel in the head with the additional weight. I certainly knew where the racket was travelling at any time. Unlike the original Hypernano 800, there’s a superb solid feel on impact which will appeal more.
Making adjustments for the additional weight and stiffness was easy considering this over the years has been my favourite specification. My clears were really good and I didn’t have to work hard to get a good result. As I was hitting a lot, I could really feel the stiffness in the frame. These new materials Victor are using are certainly working well, delivering a great feel in the shot. There was no vibration which made the racket a delight to use.
With the heavier head, you need good hands to hit those half-flick clears rather than full swing. Of course, without the strength in foreams and wrists this will prove difficult so I would recommend completing my armchair exercises if you wanted to use this racket to its fullest potential.
Drop shots were really solid, quick and controlled. There’s isn’t any drag to speak of and it was nice to hit the slice shots so easily, feeling the weight in the head moving where I wanted it to go. Using a 3U weight really felt right and I also had the chance to test a 4U version that was even quicker. This provided an interesting opportunity although there’s a noticeable difference in head weight and for me, the 3U version was the better option.
Onto the smash. The additional head weight and change in frame construction provided a much beefier feel in the smash. My testing pal Mark’s smashes were harder and it was interesting that his level of accuracy was better with this racket compared to the original Hypernano 800. Perhaps the heavier head suits his game better. I agree with this and like I said earlier, the racket reminds me of Armortec 900 Power, one of my all-time favourite rackets. So Victor can take that as a compliment. The stiffness in the shaft ensured that power was transferred quickly into the shot.
Flat drives and pushes needed work to control the additional weight, which is to be expected. However, at least the feel was solid and strong and with good hands, this racket will reward time and again.
Defence
Of course the additional head weight means you really have to swing early to time smashes. You need good fast hands to get the best out of this racket. It is slower than the original or Jetspeed 10, but that’s understandable. But, when you catch a smash on this frame there’s that solid base to drive, lift or block from. Good preparation is vital and I suggest practice is essential to get the best from 800 Power in defence.
Net area
The net area is my favourite zone these days. Surprisingly I felt really at ease with this racket, requiring little movement to get a good result no matter where the shuttle was placed. So, under the net shots provided a good solid base to push from and above the net shots needed a little squeeze or hand movement to send the shuttle in a downwards direction.
Summary
The Hypernano X 800 Power is another great racket from Victor. In some respects it falls into the wrong camp. Let me explain… The Hypernano range is supposed to be an all around performer. For me, this rackets tips into the Power range. The stiffer shaft and heavier head, combined with the really solid feel provides more power options despite performing well in all areas. I’ve tested power rackets that don’t feel as head heavy as this beauty.
On this rare occasion, it was interesting to test against the original 800 and also have a different weight to test with too. For me, the 4U version lacked the identity of the 3U, although it still packed a punch. It’s fair to say it is a watered-down version which demonstrates how important racket weight can be to bring out the best in the component features of a frame.
RRP is £190 which is to be expected for a top of the range model. Online stores have already discounted to around £165 which is £20 or so more expensive than the original 800. However, it kinda has more of everything and I do wonder whether the 800 Power is the true 800 and how Victor envisaged the original feeling? Of course this specification will not appeal to everyone however, for those players who tend to purchase rackets with this specification, then you should definitely test Hypernano 800 Power… it’s a cracker! It looks and plays great. So, despite the additional price tag and the flimsy racket bag which I don’t like, I still consider this racket deserves a 5 star rating.
Hi Paul, I am interested in this HX800P (4U).
But, how is this racket if we compare with AX88S (4U), what is the pros and cons of these two. Since I feel really fit with my 4U AX88S, but curious on another racket.
Thanks, Paul..
It’s very hard to compare rackets. HX800P was a good racket but it is no longer manufactured. Of course, it will feel different to your Astrox. But, if you are telling me you consider your Astrox fits you well, why are you looking for another racket. Invest in coaching to get better results. A new racket is not a magic wand.
Hey Paul!
I know this post has been here for more than a year already, but ai just want to ask a question. I hope I can get a response from you.
I’ve had this racket for more than a year now, and ever since have strung it with just BG65:65Ti at 28lbs. Right now my string snapped and I’m planning to try on a different string, BG80 at 28lbs, and see how it feels.
I stumbled on multiple articles/forums about different tensions when stringing the Mains and Crosses(+2) and it got me thinking if I should follow it, I just want to know from your perspective as a Professional reviewer, coach, and stringer, what does it actually do? Effect, does t even have any? And lastly, do you do this? Do you string the Mains and Crosses at different tensions? What would you recommend?
I really do hope toy hear from you.
Hi Ezekiel
Yes we follow the plus 2 rule because it works. If you think about what weaving cross strings and tensioning the string does to the main string, it adds more tension. So we balance by increasing the cross strings.
So 28lbs is actually 27/29lbs in my system
I usually string the main strings at a lower tension. If a player asks fr 25lbs tension then i string the mains at 24lbs and crosses at 26lbs. Yonex also suggest the last five cross strings are done at the same tension as the main string.
Hi paul,
Im using a jetspeed 10 3ug5 right now. But a friend of mine is offering me an exchange with his hx800 3ug5. Im not sure whether to accept the offer or not. Can you help me?
I suggest you test the HX800 first to see if you like it. This is personal taste but I wouldn’t swap
hi paul, currently i am using meteor x jjs. need to get a second racquet for emergency use. planning to get another jjs but then can’t get it here at my place anymore. looking at jetspeed 12 and hypernano 900 as a replacement. appreciate if you can suggest a racquet that is interchangeable or suitable to be use together with jjs. my concern is if i need to adjust to much when changing racquet. thanks.
Aziff – I’ve no idea how Hypernano 900 plays yet and will not get one until April. JS12, is a medium flex frame so it will bend more than JJS. If you are buying Jetspeed 12 you need to ensure you get the 3U version.
Hi Paul..
I have hx800p 4U..
I want power racket which less stiff / more flex…
Think victor tk 9000 or yonex ld force..
weight 4U or 3U…
Thanks…
I would select LD Force because it has more flex, or alternaively Jetspeed 12 in 3U format.
Thanks Paul,
Already buy JS12 3U based on your review.. As you say, it feel amazing n suit me well..
I want to add racket like JS12 3U feel (medium flex @6-7 RRI) with add little head weight..
is ld force the aswer that I look for (3U or 4U version)
Regards,
Greetings Paul!
I’ve just recently ordered my HX800P. No problem with that.
I just want to know why is it that the JS12 could handle a higher tensions limit than the HX800P.
The JS12 could go up to 30lbs while the HX800P could only go to 28lbs. Isn’t the HX800 supposed to have a higher tension limit? Noting that it’s a “power” racket? Or am I missing something?
Hoping for your response! More power to you, Paul!
Hi Zeke
JS12 was introduced later than 800 Power and I can only think this is the reason why the higher string tension is determined. POwer does not come from higher tension, quite the opposite. PLayers have high tensions for better control – they can’t get any more power from a racket.
Hi Paul,
would you happen to have any insight in regards to a comparison between the Hypernano Power and the Thruster 9000? I’m specifically wondering about head heaviness and stiffness. Many thanks and thank you for sharing your time with us.
Jay
That’s a dfficult question to answer. Both are great rackets. I would say Thruster is slightly head heavier. They are similar in stiffness. The frame construction gives them a different feel but that is the hard part, describing what this is.
Hi Paul, Thanks a lot for your reviews, I enjoyed that very much for many months now, today I decided to register.
I’m currently using voltric 80, it has been 5 years or so. I’m thinking to get a second racket. From reading your reviews, I have been looking for voltric 5, but it seems out of stock everywhere.
Now I have an idea to buy a racket with a little different feel from my voltric 80, instead of a “cheaper version of vt80”. The racket you introduced here, Victor HX 800 Power is very interesting. By comparing this with the previous HX800 (original), I was wondering if the new HX800 Power may give very similar feel of voltric 80? And the HX800 (original) may give a “lighter and more flexible” feel? I love my VT80, but I’m looking to try out something new, perhaps something lighter but still powerful and great control.
Sorry for long message, wish to hear your comments. Thank you and have a great day!
The 800 Power is a lot closer to VT80 than the original 800. It’s a superb racket. It well worth a try.
Hi Paul, I am a 26 years old badminton player currently living in south korea.
I would like to ask your permission for me to introduce your blog, translating some of your articles so that I could share your information with my community members.
Please leave me a comment.
Thank you.
Hi
Many thanks for your question. I string for the Korean players at the All Englands and Korea is my favourite team. I’d be delighted for you to introduce my website to Korean badminton players. I would love to talk with these players and/or coaches and understand the badminton system in Korea. PLease let me know when you intend to launch and send me a link to your website. All I request is that any articles etc that you translate will have my name and website details.
I hope to hear from you again.
Paul
Thank you
I am currently uploading translated text of your articles on Naver Cafe.
Naver(www.naver.com) is online search engine service provider of South Korea.
There is community function named ‘Naver Cafe’, where Korean people can share their interest online.
http://cafe.naver.com/sdaminton : this is the internet address of badminton internet community on which I upload translated version of your articles. I notify the fact that I am uploading translation of your text in headline. Also, I write your blog’s internet address and the address of your original article in the early stage of my translation.
http://cafe.naver.com/sdaminton/34678 : This is the address of translated version of your article (Why Egos and Incorrect Information About String Tensions In Badminton Could Be Doing More Harm Than Good). I changed few terms so that you can see it by pasting this address into your browser. I hope you could see this without any discomfort. If you have troubles connecting to the page, maybe a Korean member of your community could help.
Thank you for your approval. I will keep in touch.
Thanks for the update. I looked at the links. To be honest, I couldn’t read anything and am relying on your honesty with my content. Aside from that, Google knows I published it first so I’ve no issues with it.
Good luck and I hope it is successful.
Dear Paul,
I am interested in how this racket in 3u compares against the mx jjs in terms of stiffness, power and feel. I am not interested in the 4u. Thank you.
you may find 800 Power feels around same stiffness and head heavier compared to JJS. I think JJS is slightly more powerful on the basis the majority of players will find the slightly lighter head easier to swing – no other reason. If you can handle the extra weight in the head then you should enjoy 800 Power.
Expect Power to be available this year only. It is limited edition and I think it will be withdrawn at some stage but I have no idea when.
Hi Paul,
Nice review yet again. I was wondering how would this fare againt the mx jjs? I had broken 3 now and find them impossible to replace nowadays. I am now using a duora 10 which is a great racket although i still miss my jjs. How would the 800ltd fare in terms of feel, speed and power?
Aprilson
It’s very good indeed. I used 3U but managed to have a quick test of 4U version too. Of course 4U is faster. Both are really solid feel . It’s worth a try.
Hey Paul,
I thought about buying a new racket for a long time but couldn´t decide on the ideal racket 🙁
I read about 70-80 of your (very well written) reviews and now I´m torn between Yonex Voltric 80 E-tune, Victor Jetspeed 10 and Victor Hypernano X 800 LTD Power.
Could you please tell me which one to buy and why. Maybe you could do a strength-weakness/pro-con comparison.
Your advice would help me alot.<3
Thank you
Hi there
I can’t tell you which racket to buy. If you have read my aritcle on choosing a racket, then you will know the reason why. I wasn’t a great fan of 80 Etune. I thought the original was better. JS10 continues to be a very strong seller around the world demonstrating power and speed in abundance. 800 Ltd power is really nice, much heavier in feel compared to JS10. It may be you need to consider a 4U version of 800 Ltd power as 3U may be too heavy and stiff.
Good luck
Thanks for answering 😀
Helped me alot
Thanks for the review. How would you compare it to Yonex Voltric 70 or 80 in terms of power and frame speed? My ideal singles racket would be like Voltric 70 with stiffer shaft and I’m wondering if Hypernano X800 Power would be anything like that. Thanks.
Yes, HX800 Ltd Power will most certainly feel stiffer and a touch heavier than Voltric 70.
Hi Coach Paul,
Great review as always. Glad to see that Hypernano X800 Power is similar to the Armortec 900 Power. I’m hoping HX800 Control is an improved Armortec 900 Technique. Anyways, have you tried the Hypernano X Air? I am wondering how it compared to the Jetspeed S10. Thanks
-Tom
I’ve hada few minutes hitting with the Air. Mine was a 5U version and overall i find it too light to gauge any feel from it.